Threshold effects of environmental regulation types on green investment by heavily polluting enterprises

被引:47
作者
Wang, Zhenhua [1 ]
Wang, Ning [2 ]
Hu, Xingqiu [1 ]
Wang, Hongpeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Business Sch, Nanjing 210000, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Normal Univ, Business Sch, Kewen Coll, Xuzhou 221000, Peoples R China
关键词
Formal environmental regulation; Informal environmental regulation; Green investment; Heavily polluting enterprises; ATMOSPHERIC-ENVIRONMENT; INNOVATION; TRANSFORMATION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1186/s12302-022-00606-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background In the stage of sustainable development, enterprises should not only focus on economic efficiency, but also on ecological protection, for which the governments of various countries has adopted various environmental regulation methods to promote green investment by enterprises. However, there are many types of environmental regulations, and the relationship between policy formulation and implementation effects is complicated. Heavily polluting enterprises as the main carrier of resource consumption and pollutant emissions is the main target of environmental regulation. Based on this, we took China's heavily polluting listed companies as examples to explore the impact of different types of environmental regulations on green investment in heavily polluting enterprises. Results In this paper, environmental regulations were divided into formal and informal types, of which formal environmental regulations (FER) were subdivided into command-control and market-incentive types. The empirical results showed that the relationship between command-control environmental regulations and green investment by heavily polluting enterprises presents an inverted "U" shape, and market-incentive environmental regulations first have no effect on and then promote green investment by heavily polluting enterprises. Besides, informal environmental regulations (IER) have maintained a positive effect on green investment by heavily polluting enterprises. Conclusions Heavily polluting enterprises, respectively, employ passive, active and voluntary green investment strategies under the three types of environmental regulations, providing a reference for the government to promote green investment by enterprises by environmental regulations more effectively.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Cohen, Mark A. ;
Elgie, Stewart ;
Lanoie, Paul .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) :2-22
[2]  
Cai W.G., 2017, Economist, V225, P27, DOI DOI 10.16158/J.CNKI.51-1312/F.2017.09.005
[3]  
Chai RQ, 2020, J ENVIRON PROT ECOL, V21, P2100
[4]   Environmental regulations and emissions trading in China [J].
Chang, Yen-Chiang ;
Wang, Nannan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (07) :3356-3364
[5]   The emissions reduction effect and technical progress effect of environmental regulation policy tools [J].
Cheng, Zhonghua ;
Li, Lianshui ;
Liu, Jun .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 149 :191-205
[6]   Environmental regulation and US states' technical inefficiency [J].
Chintrakarn, Pandej .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2008, 100 (03) :363-365
[7]   Linking economic growth pathways and environmental sustainability by understanding development as alternate social-ecological regimes [J].
Cumming, Graeme S. ;
von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (38) :9533-9538
[8]   The impact of outward foreign direct investment on green innovation: the threshold effect of environmental regulation [J].
Dai, Lihua ;
Mu, Xiuru ;
Lee, Chien-Chiang ;
Liu, Wei .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (26) :34868-34884
[9]   环境规制的“本地—邻地”绿色技术进步效应 [J].
董直庆 ;
王辉 .
中国工业经济, 2019, (01) :100-118
[10]  
Falcone Pasquale Marcello, 2020, International Journal of Green Economics, V14, P159