Could ginseng-based medicines be better than nitrates in treating ischemic heart disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:17
|
作者
Jia, Yongliang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Shikai [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Fangyi [3 ]
Leung, Siu-wai [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Macau, Inst Chinese Med Sci, Taipa, Macao Sar, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Macau, State Key Lab Qual Res Chinese Med, Taipa, Macao Sar, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Macau, Fac Social Sci & Humanities, Taipa, Macao Sar, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Informat, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Ginseng; Nitrates; Ischemic heart disease; Angina pectoris; Randomized controlled trials; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE; QUALITY; JOURNALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ctim.2011.12.002
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Background: Ginseng-based medicines and nitrates are commonly used in treating ischemic heart disease (IHD) angina pectoris in China. Hundreds of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported in Chinese language claimed that ginseng-based medicines can relieve the symptoms of IHD. This study provides the first PRISMA-compliant systematic review with sensitivity and subgroup analyses to evaluate the RCTs comparing the efficacies of ginseng-based medicines and nitrates in treating ischemic heart disease, particularly angina pectoris. Methods: Past RCTs published up to 2010 on ginseng versus nitrates in treating IHD for 14 or more days were retrieved from major English and Chinese databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, WangFang Data, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure. The qualities of included RCTs were assessed with Jadad scale, a refined Jadad scale called M scale, CONSORT 2010 checklist, and Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis was performed on the primary outcomes including the improvement of symptoms and electrocardiography (ECG). Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were performed to evaluate the effects of study characteristics of RCTs, including quality, follow-up periods, and efficacy definitions on the overall effect size of ginseng. Results: Eighteen RCTs with 1549 participants were included. Overall odds ratios for comparing ginseng-based medicines with nitrates were 3.00 (95% Cl: 2.27-3.96) in symptom improvement (n = 18) and 1.61(95% CI: 1.20-2.15) in ECG improvement (n = 10). Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression found no significant difference in overall effects among all study characteristics, indicating that the overall effects were stable. Conclusion: The meta-analysis of 18 eligible RCTs demonstrates moderate evidence that ginseng is more effective than nitrates for treating angina pectoris. However, further RCTs for higher quality, longer follow-up periods, lager sample size, multi-center/country, and are still required to verify the efficacy. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 166
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intramyocardial autologous bone marrow cell transplantation for ischemic heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Tian, Tao
    Chen, Bingwei
    Xiao, Yan
    Yang, Kunqi
    Zhou, Xianliang
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2014, 233 (02) : 485 - 492
  • [32] Remote ischemic conditioning and cardioprotection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Le Page, Sophie
    Bejan-Angoulvant, Theodora
    Angoulvant, Denis
    Prunier, Fabrice P
    BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 110 (02)
  • [33] Remote ischemic conditioning and cardioprotection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Sophie Le Page
    Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant
    Denis Angoulvant
    Fabrice Prunier
    Basic Research in Cardiology, 2015, 110
  • [34] Effects of Ginseng Consumption on Cardiovascular Health Biomarkers in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhang, Xiao-Feng
    Min, Rui-Xue
    Wang, Zhen
    Qi, Yue
    Li, Ruo-Nan
    Fan, Jian-Ming
    PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2024, 38 (12) : 5873 - 5900
  • [35] Cannabis use in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
    Vaid, Rayyan
    Fareed, Areeba
    Qader, Rabia
    Hussain, Aariz
    Shaikh, Wajiha
    Zameer, Ushna
    Ochani, Sidhant
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2025, : 439 - 446
  • [36] Cupping therapy for Treating Knee Osteoarthritis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Guo, Mei-ying
    Tang, Ying-ji
    He, Zhi-ping
    Zhang, Qiu-xiang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 12 : 131 - 134
  • [37] Amniotic membrane for treating chronic cutaneous ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liang, Xinglong
    Zhou, Li
    Yan, Jun
    Singh, Shivank
    Singh, Shantanu
    Chien, Ching-Wen
    Tung, Tao-Hsin
    DERMATOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 38 (03) : 151 - 158
  • [38] Qingfei Paidu decoction for treating COVID-19 A protocol for a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Yuan
    Xie, Hongyan
    Li, Yan
    Li, Tianhao
    Yuan, Haipo
    Fu, Xiaoxu
    Xie, Chunguang
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (36) : E22040
  • [39] Ultrafiltration for acute decompensated heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Kwong, Joey S. W.
    Yu, Cheuk-Man
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 172 (02) : 395 - 402
  • [40] Efficacy of Cannabis-Based Medicines for Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Aviram, J.
    Samuelly-Leichtag, G.
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2017, 20 (06) : E755 - E795