Insulin Delivery Method and Admission for Glycemic Control in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

被引:4
作者
Sperling, Jeffrey D. [1 ]
Maggio, Lindsay [2 ]
Has, Phinnara [3 ]
Daley, Julie [3 ]
Coustan, Donald R. [3 ]
Werner, Erika F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, 550 16th St,7th Floor,Box 0132, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Florida Hosp Med Grp, Maternal Fetal Care Ctr, Orlando, FL USA
[3] Brown Univ, Women & Infants Hosp Rhode Isl, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Div Maternal Fetal Med,Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
type 1 diabetes mellitus; CSII; glycemic control; continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; multiple daily injections; insulin; pregnancy; MULTIPLE DAILY INJECTIONS; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; INFUSION; THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; CARE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0037-1604196
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To determine if there was a difference in glycemic control admissions or perinatal outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) treated with multiple daily injections (MDIs) versus continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Materials and Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of women with type 1 DM with a singleton gestation who delivered between 2006 and 2014 at a tertiary hospital and received care at a dedicated DM clinic. Women who used MDI were compared with those who used CSII. The primary outcome was glycemic control admission during pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included adverse perinatal outcomes. Results There were a total of 156 women; 107 treated with MDI and 49 with CSII. Women treated with MDI had higher rates of glycemic control admissions versus those treated with CSII (68.2 vs. 30.6%, p <0.001). Adjusting for age, ethnicity, public insurer, duration of DM, first recorded hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and DM comorbidities, the likelihood of admission remained higher in women on MDI versus CSII (AOR 5.9 [1.7-20.6]). Women treated with MDI had higher rates of postprandial hypoglycemia. Other perinatal outcomes were similar between the groups. Conclusion Women with type 1 DM treated with MDI were more likely to have glycemic control admissions and postprandial hypoglycemia than those treated with CSII.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 214
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Outcome of pregnancy in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DMP): results from combined diabetes-obstetrical clinics in Dublin in three university teaching hospitals (1995-2006) [J].
Al-Agha, R. ;
Firth, R. G. ;
Byrne, M. ;
Murray, S. ;
Daly, S. ;
Foley, M. ;
Smith, S. C. ;
Kinsley, B. T. .
IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 181 (01) :105-109
[2]  
Botta R M, 1986, Minerva Med, V77, P657
[3]  
Brooten D, 1998, J Perinatol, V18, P372
[4]  
CARTA Q, 1986, DIABETES METAB, V12, P121
[5]   Outcomes of pregnancy in insulin dependent diabetic women: results of a five year population cohort study [J].
Casson, IF ;
Clarke, CA ;
Howard, CV ;
McKendrick, O ;
Pennycook, S ;
Pharoah, POD ;
Platt, MJ ;
Stanisstreet, M ;
vanVelszen, D ;
Walkinshaw, S .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7103) :275-278
[6]   Risk of complications of pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes: nationwide prospective study in the Netherlands [J].
Evers, IN ;
de Valk, HW ;
Visser, GHA .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7445) :915-918A
[7]   Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections of insulin for pregnant women with diabetes [J].
Farrar, Diane ;
Tuffnell, Derek J. ;
West, Jane ;
West, Helen M. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (06) :CD005542
[8]   A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants [J].
Fenton, Tanis R. ;
Kim, Jae H. .
BMC PEDIATRICS, 2013, 13
[9]   Management of diabetes mellitus complicating pregnancy [J].
Gabbe, SG ;
Graves, CR .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 102 (04) :857-868
[10]   Benefits, risks, costs, and patient satisfaction associated with insulin pump therapy for the pregnancy complicated by type 1 diabetes mellitus [J].
Gabbe, SG ;
Holing, E ;
Temple, P ;
Brown, ZA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (06) :1283-1290