Global assessment of lagged and cumulative effects of drought on grassland gross primary production

被引:128
作者
Wei, Xiaonan [1 ]
He, Wei [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Zhou, Yanlian [1 ]
Ju, Weimin [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, Jingfeng [3 ]
Li, Xing [4 ]
Liu, Yibo [5 ]
Xu, Shuhao [1 ]
Bi, Wenjun [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Cheng, Nuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Geog & Ocean Sci,Minist Nat Resources, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Geog Informat Sci & Technol, Key Lab Land Satellite Remote Sensing Applicat, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ, Int Inst Earth Syst Sci, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ New Hampshire, Earth Syst Res Ctr, Inst Study Earth Oceans & Space, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Res Inst Agr & Life Sci, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[5] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Appl Meteorol, Jiangsu Key Lab Agr Meteorol, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Remote Sensing Sci Jointly Sponsore, Beijing 100854, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gross primary productivity; Water stress; Lagged effect; Cumulative effect; Carbon cycle; Grassland; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOIL-MOISTURE; CARBON UPTAKE; VEGETATION PRODUCTIVITY; ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES; ECOSYSTEM STABILITY; EXTREME DROUGHT; WATER-STRESS; TIME-SCALES; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108646
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Drought has large impacts on the vegetation growth of global terrestrial ecosystems, particularly grasslands. Extensive in-situ studies have shown that the impact of drought on vegetation growth has lagged and cumulative effects, but it is not well known how grassland productivity (gross primary production or GPP) responds to drought over time at large scales. Here, we investigated the spatiotemporal patterns of lagged and cumulative effects of drought on global grassland GPP using an OCO-2 solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) based GPP product (GOSIF GPP) and the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI). The results showed that globally, 88.37% of the grassland had a lagged response to drought, with a lagged time scale of mainly 1 month. With the increase in soil water availability, the magnitude of the lagged effect gradually weakened. Grasslands in semiarid and semi humid conditions that were adaptable to periodic drought responded fastest to drought. Globally, more than three quarters (78.55%) of the grassland was affected by the cumulative effect of drought. The accumulated months occurred at longer time scales (8 similar to 10 months) for the region at 40 degrees N-55 degrees N, which is relatively arid. The cumulative effect in relatively arid areas was stronger than that in relatively humid areas, indicating that grasslands in more arid areas had stronger tolerance to drought. More importantly, we found that the cumulative effect of drought on grassland GPP was stronger than the lagged effect. This study highlights the great importance of considering the legacy effect, especially the cumulative effect, of drought on grassland productivity, which would advance our understanding of the impact of climate change on the carbon and water cycles of terrestrial ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 126 条
[1]   Spatiotemporal patterns of terrestrial gross primary production: A review [J].
Anav, Alessandro ;
Friedlingstein, Pierre ;
Beer, Christian ;
Ciais, Philippe ;
Harper, Anna ;
Jones, Chris ;
Murray-Tortarolo, Guillermo ;
Papale, Dario ;
Parazoo, Nicholas C. ;
Peylin, Philippe ;
Piao, Shilong ;
Sitch, Stephen ;
Viovy, Nicolas ;
Wiltshire, Andy ;
Zhao, Maosheng .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 53 (03) :785-818
[2]   Pervasive drought legacies in forest ecosystems and their implications for carbon cycle models [J].
Anderegg, W. R. L. ;
Schwalm, C. ;
Biondi, F. ;
Camarero, J. J. ;
Koch, G. ;
Litvak, M. ;
Ogle, K. ;
Shaw, J. D. ;
Shevliakova, E. ;
Williams, A. P. ;
Wolf, A. ;
Ziaco, E. ;
Pacala, S. .
SCIENCE, 2015, 349 (6247) :528-532
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014, V80, P1
[4]   Analysis of Drought Intensity and Trends Using the Modified SPEI in South Korea from 1981 to 2010 [J].
Bae, Seungjong ;
Lee, Sang-Hyun ;
Yoo, Seung-Hwan ;
Kim, Taegon .
WATER, 2018, 10 (03)
[5]   Mustweincorporate soil moisture information when applying light use efficiency models with satellite remote sensing information? [J].
Baldocchi, Dennis D. .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2018, 218 (04) :1293-1294
[6]  
Banziger M., 2000, BREEDING DROUGHT NIT
[7]   Vegetation productivity responds to sub-annual climate conditions across semiarid biomes [J].
Barnes, Mallory L. ;
Moran, M. Susan ;
Scott, Russell L. ;
Kolb, Thomas E. ;
Ponce-Campos, Guillermo E. ;
Moore, David J. P. ;
Ross, Morgan A. ;
Mitra, Bhaskar ;
Dore, Sabina .
ECOSPHERE, 2016, 7 (05)
[8]   Impacts of drought stress on water relations and carbon assimilation in grassland species at different altitudes [J].
Bollig, Christine ;
Feller, Urs .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 188 :212-220
[9]   Contrasting Effects of Precipitation Manipulations on Production in Two Sites within the Central Grassland Region, USA [J].
Byrne, Kerry M. ;
Lauenroth, William K. ;
Adler, Peter B. .
ECOSYSTEMS, 2013, 16 (06) :1039-1051
[10]   Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant [J].
Chaves, MM ;
Maroco, JP ;
Pereira, JS .
FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY, 2003, 30 (03) :239-264