Statistical shape analysis via principal factor analysis

被引:9
作者
Aguirre, Mauricio Reyes [1 ]
Linguraru, Marius George [2 ]
Marias, Kostas [3 ]
Ayache, Nicholas [4 ]
Nolte, Lutz-Peter [1 ]
Ballester, Miguel Angel Gonzalez [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, MEM Res Ctr, Inst Surg Technol & Biomech, Stauffacherstr 78, CH-3014 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Engn & Appl Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Fdn Res & Technol Hellas, Inst Comp Sci, GR-71110 Iraklion, Greece
[4] INRIA, Asclepios Res Project, F-06902 Sophia Antipolis, France
来源
2007 4TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING : MACRO TO NANO, VOLS 1-3 | 2007年
关键词
image shape analysis; biomedical image processing; principal factor analysis; principal component analysis; morphometry;
D O I
10.1109/ISBI.2007.357077
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Statistical shape analysis techniques commonly employed in the medical imaging community, such as Active Shape Models or Active Appearance Models, rely on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to decompose shape variability into a reduced set of interpretable components. In this paper we propose Principal Factor Analysis (PFA) as an alternative and complementary tool to PCA providing a decomposition into modes of variation that can be more easily interpretable, while still being a linear efficient technique that performs dimensionality reduction (as opposed to Independent Component Analysis, ICA). The key difference between PFA and PCA is that PFA models covariance between variables, rather than the total variance in the data. The added value of PFA is illustrated on 2D landmark data of corpora callosa outlines. Then, a study of the 3D shape variability of the human left femur is performed. Finally, we report results on vector-valued 3D deformation fields resulting from non-rigid registration of ventricles in MRI of the brain.
引用
收藏
页码:1216 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Dimensionality reduction of electropalatographic data using latent variable models [J].
Carreira-Perpiñán, MA ;
Renals, S .
SPEECH COMMUNICATION, 1998, 26 (04) :259-282
[2]   Kernel Factor Analysis with Varimax rotation [J].
Charles, D ;
Fyfe, C .
IJCNN 2000: PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE-INNS-ENNS INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOL III, 2000, :381-386
[3]   Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom [J].
Collins, DL ;
Zijdenbos, AP ;
Kollokian, V ;
Sled, JG ;
Kabani, NJ ;
Holmes, CJ ;
Evans, AC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 17 (03) :463-468
[4]   Active appearance models [J].
Cootes, TF ;
Edwards, GJ ;
Taylor, CJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2001, 23 (06) :681-685
[5]  
COOTES TF, 1995, ACTIVE SHAPE MODELS, V61
[6]  
Fodor IK, 2002, UCRL-ID-148494
[7]  
HUANG CC, 2001, P INT C NEUR INF PRO
[8]  
Üzümcü M, 2003, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2878, P451
[9]   COMMON FACTOR-ANALYSIS VERSUS PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS - DIFFERENTIAL BIAS IN REPRESENTING MODEL PARAMETERS [J].
WIDAMAN, KF .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1993, 28 (03) :263-311