Acceptable medication non-adherence: A crowdsourcing study among French physicians for commonly prescribed medications

被引:3
作者
Sidorkiewicz, Stephanie [1 ,2 ]
Tran, Viet-Thi [2 ]
Ravaudz, Philippe [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Paris Descartes Univ, Dept Gen Med, Paris, France
[2] INSERM, UMR 1153, METHODS Team, Ctr Res Epidemiol & Stat,Sorbonne Paris Cite CRES, Paris, France
[3] Cochrane France, Paris, France
[4] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY USA
关键词
ADHERENCE RATE THRESHOLD; DRUG-THERAPY; MORTALITY; CONSEQUENCES; PATTERNS; OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0209023
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Achieving good medication adherence is a major challenge for patients with chronic conditions. Our study aimed to assess the Threshold for Unacceptable Risk of Non-adherence (TURN), defined as the threshold at which physicians consider the health risks incurred by patients due to medication non-adherence unacceptable, for the most commonly prescribed drugs in France. Methods We conducted an online study using a crowdsourcing approach among French general practitioners and specialists from September 2016 to August 2017. Physicians assessed the TURN for various levels of missed doses by evaluating a series of randomly presented clinical vignettes, each presenting a given medication with a given therapeutic indication. For each "drug-indication group" (i.e., all drugs from the same pharmacological class with a similar therapeutic indication): 1) we described the distribution of physicians' assessments, 2) we provided a summary estimate of the TURN, defined as the frequency of missed doses above which 75% of the physicians' assessments were located; 3) we computed the number of pill boxes reimbursed in France in 2016 to put our results into context. Results We collected a total of 5365 assessments from 544 physicians, each of whom evaluated a random sample among 528 distinct clinical vignettes. Estimates of the TURN varied widely across drug-indication groups, ranging from risk considered unacceptable with 1 daily dose missed per month (e.g., insulin for diabetes) to risk always considered acceptable (e.g., anti-dementia drugs). Drugs with an estimated TURN of over one missing daily dose per week represented 44.9% of the prescription volume of the medications assessed in our study. Conclusions According to physicians, the impact of non-adherence may vary greatly. Patient-physician discussions on the variable consequences of non-adherence could lead to a paradigm shift by seeking to reach "optimal adherence" depending on drugs rather than unrealistic "perfect adherence" to all drugs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ATC DDD IND 2017
[2]   Quantification of the Forgiveness of Drugs to Imperfect Adherence [J].
Assawasuwannakit, P. ;
Braund, R. ;
Duffull, S. B. .
CPT-PHARMACOMETRICS & SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 4 (03) :204-211
[3]   Using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships to predict the effect of poor compliance [J].
Boissel, JP ;
Nony, P .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2002, 41 (01) :1-6
[4]   Relationship of blood pressure control to adherence with anti hypertensive monotherapy in 13 managed care organizations [J].
Bramley, TJ ;
Gerbino, PP ;
Nightengale, BS ;
Frech-Tamas, F .
JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE PHARMACY, 2006, 12 (03) :239-245
[5]   Clinical consequences of non adherence to immunosuppressive medication in kidney transplant patients [J].
Denhaerynck, Kris ;
Burkhalter, Felix ;
Schafer-Keller, Petra ;
Steiger, Jurg ;
Bock, Andeas ;
De Geest, Sabina .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 22 (04) :441-446
[6]   Differences between perspectives of physicians and patients on anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: observational study [J].
Devereaux, PJ ;
Anderson, DR ;
Gardner, MJ ;
Putnam, W ;
Flowerdew, GJ ;
Brownell, BF ;
Nagpal, S ;
Cox, JL .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7323) :1218-1221
[7]   Treatment adherence in chronic disease [J].
Dunbar-Jacob, J ;
Mortimer-Stephens, MK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 :S57-S60
[8]   Non-adherence and its consequences: understanding the nature of relapse [J].
Emsley, Robin .
WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 12 (03) :234-235
[9]   HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH - PSYCHOMETRIC STUDY OF ATTITUDES TOWARDS TECHNOLOGICAL RISKS AND BENEFITS [J].
FISCHHOFF, B ;
SLOVIC, P ;
LICHTENSTEIN, S ;
READ, S ;
COMBS, B .
POLICY SCIENCES, 1978, 9 (02) :127-152
[10]  
GOODMAN LA, 1961, ANN MATH STAT, V32, P148, DOI 10.1214/aoms/1177705148