Health care resource use and stroke outcome - Multinational comparisons within the GAIN International trial

被引:19
作者
Asplund, K [1 ]
Ashburner, S
Cargill, K
Hux, M
Lees, K
Drummond, M
机构
[1] Univ Umea Hosp, Dept Med, S-90185 Umea, Sweden
[2] Glaxo Wellcome Res & Dev Ltd, Greenford, Middx, England
[3] Innovus Res, Burlington, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Glasgow, Western Infirm, Dept Med & Therapeut, Glasgow G11 6NT, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
health care resource use; length of hospital stay; survival; functional outcome;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462303000242
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose: Outcome in patients hospitalized for acute stroke varies considerably between populations. Within the framework of the GAIN international trial, a large multicenter trial of a neuroprotective agent (gavestinel, glycine antagonist), stroke outcome in relation to health care resource use has been compared in a large number of countries, allowing for differences in case mix. Methods: This substudy includes 1,422 patients in 19 countries grouped into 10 regions. Data on prognostic variables on admission to hospital, resource use, and outcome were analyzed by regression models. Results: All results were adjusted for differences in prognostic factors on admission (NIH Stroke Scale, age, comorbidity). There were threefold variations in the average number of days in hospital/institutional care (from 20 to 60 days). The proportion of patients who met with professional rehabilitation staff also varied greatly. Three-month case fatality ranged from 11 % to 28%, and mean Barthel ADL score at three months varied between 64 and 73. There was no relationship between health care resource use and outcome in terms of survival and ADL function at three months. The proportion of patients living at home at three months did not show any relationship to ADL function across countries. Conclusions: There are wide variations in health care resource use between countries, unexplained by differences in case mix. Across countries, there is no obvious relationship between resource use and clinical outcome after stroke. Differences in health care traditions (treatment pathways) and social context seem to be major determinants of resource use. In making comparisons between countries, great care should be exercised in using outcome variables as indicators of quality of stroke care.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 277
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, STROKE UNITS EVIDENC
[2]   Multinational comparison of diagnostic procedures and management of acute stroke: The WHO MONICA study [J].
Asplund, K ;
Rajakangas, AM ;
Kuulasmaa, K ;
Thorvaldsen, P ;
Bonita, R ;
Stegmayr, B ;
Suzuki, K ;
Eisenblatter, D .
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 1996, 6 (02) :66-74
[3]   Acute neurological stroke care in Europe: results of the European Stroke Care Inventory [J].
Brainin, M ;
Bornstein, N ;
Boysen, G ;
Demarin, V .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2000, 7 (01) :5-10
[4]   Home rehabilitation after stroke - Reviewing the scientific evidence on effects and costs [J].
Britton, M ;
Andersson, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 16 (03) :842-848
[5]   Predicting treatment costs after acute ischemic stroke on the basis of patient characteristics at presentation and early dysfunction [J].
Caro, JJ ;
Huybrechts, KF ;
Kelley, HE .
STROKE, 2001, 32 (01) :100-106
[6]   Management patterns and costs of acute ischemic stroke - An international study [J].
Caro, JJ ;
Huybrechts, KF ;
Duchesne, I .
STROKE, 2000, 31 (03) :582-590
[7]  
DRUMMOND MF, 1986, ROYAL COLL MED SERVI, V99
[8]   Systematic review of cost-effectiveness research of stroke evaluation and treatment [J].
Ebrahim, S .
STROKE, 1999, 30 (12) :2759-2759
[9]   Economic evaluation in stroke research - A systematic review [J].
Evers, SMAA ;
Ament, AJHA ;
Blaauw, G .
STROKE, 2000, 31 (05) :1046-1053
[10]   Neuroprotection in acute ischaemic stroke: a tale of for whom the bell tolls? [J].
Gorelick, PB .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9219) :1925-1926