Group choice: The ideal free distribution of human social behavior

被引:33
作者
Kraft, JR
Baum, WM
机构
[1] Armstrong Atlantic State Univ, Dept Psychol, Savannah, GA 31419 USA
[2] Univ New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA
关键词
group choice; ideal free distribution; social behavior; matching law; card choices; humans;
D O I
10.1901/jeab.2001.76-21
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Group choice refers to the distribution of group members between two choice alternatives over time. The ideal free distribution (IFD), an optimal foraging model from behavioral ecology, predicts that the ratio of foragers at two resource sites should equal the ratio of obtained resources, a prediction that is formally analogous to the matching law of individual choice, except that group choice is a social phenomenon. Two experiments investigated the usefulness of IFD analyses of human group choice and individual-based explanations that might account for the group-level events. Instead of nonhuman animals foraging at two sites for resources, a group of humans chose blue and red cards to receive points that could earn cash prizes. The groups chose blue and red cards in ratios in positive relation to (lie ratios of points associated with the cards. When group choice ratios and point ratios were plotted on logarithmic coordinates and fitted with regression lines, the slopes (i.e., sensitivity measures) approached 1.0 but tended to fall short of it (i.e., undermatching), with little bias and little unaccounted for variance. These experiments demonstrate that an IFD analysis of group choice is possible and useful, and suggest that group choice may be explained by the individual members' tendency to optimize reinforcement.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 42
页数:22
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Group choice: Competition, travel, and the ideal free distribution [J].
Baum, WM ;
Kraft, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1998, 69 (03) :227-245
[3]   2 TYPES OF DEVIATION FROM MATCHING LAW - BIAS AND UNDERMATCHING [J].
BAUM, WM .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1974, 22 (01) :231-242
[4]   INCREASING AND SIGNALING BACKGROUND REINFORCEMENT - EFFECT ON THE FOREGROUND RESPONSE-REINFORCER RELATION [J].
BELKE, TW ;
HEYMAN, GM .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1994, 61 (01) :65-81
[5]  
FAGAN R, 1987, EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, V1, P5
[6]  
FRETWELL S D, 1969, Acta Biotheoretica, V19, P16, DOI 10.1007/BF01601953
[7]  
GUERIN B, 1994, ANAL SOCIAL BEHAV AN
[8]   COMPETITIVE FORAGING IN MALLARDS - IDEAL FREE DUCKS [J].
HARPER, DGC .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1982, 30 (MAY) :575-584
[9]   ON THE LAW OF EFFECT [J].
Herrnstein, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1970, 13 (02) :243-266