Identification of the Optimal Cut-Off Value of PSA for Assessing Severity of Disease in [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Study in Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy

被引:2
作者
Cegla, Paulina [1 ]
Wojewodzka, Marta [1 ]
Gorczewska, Izabela [2 ]
Chalewska, Wioletta [1 ]
Lapinska, Grazyna [1 ]
Ochman, Pawel [1 ]
Sackiewicz, Agata [1 ]
Dedecjus, Marek [1 ]
机构
[1] Maria Sklodowska Curie Natl Res Inst Oncol, Dept Endocrine Oncol & Nucl Med, PL-02781 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Maria Sklodowska Curie Natl Res Inst Oncol, Dept Nucl Med & Endocrine Oncol, PL-44102 Gliwice, Poland
关键词
positron emission tomography; computed tomography; prostate-specific membrane antigen; prostate cancer; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; TOMOGRAPHY; PATTERNS; UTILITY; TISSUE; GA-68; RISK; F-18;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics12020349
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the optimal cut-off value of prostate specific antigen (PSA) to assess the extent of the disease in [Ga-68]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT study in patients after radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on a group of 215 patients who underwent a [Ga-68]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT examination because of suspected recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Patients were divided into four groups: 1, no active lesions suggesting recurrence (n = 92); 2, suspected isolated local recurrence (n = 19); 3, oligometastatic disease (n = 82); and 4, polymetastatic disease (n = 22). Results: In group 1, the mean PSA level was 0.962 ng/mL (median: 0.376; min: 0.004; max: 25 ng/mL); in group 2, it was 4.970 ng/mL (median 1.320; min: 0.003; max: 40.350 ng/mL); in group 3, it was 2.802 ng/mL (median: 1.270; min: 0.020; max: 59.670 ng/mL); and in group 4, it was 4.997 ng/mL (median: 3.795; min: 0.007; max 21.110 ng/mL). Statistically significant differences were shown in PSA levels when comparing groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.0025) and groups 3 and 4 (p = 0.0474). The PSA cut-off point for discriminating groups 1 and 2 was 0.831 (sensitivity: 0.684; specificity: 0.772; area under the curve (AUC): 0.775), and for groups 3 and 4, it was 2.51 (sensitivity: 0.682; specificity: 0.780; AUC: 0.720). Conclusions: Our preliminary data suggested that the PSA level has an essential influence on determining the extent of disease in a [Ga-68]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT study in patients after radical prostatectomy. Identification of the optimal cut-off values for the oligo- and polymetastatic diseases might be helpful in stratifying these patients.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Impact of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT on management in prostate cancer patients with very early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Bashir, Usman ;
Tree, Alison ;
Mayer, Erik ;
Levine, Daniel ;
Parker, Chris ;
Dearnaley, David ;
Oyen, Wim J. G. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2019, 46 (04) :901-907
[2]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[3]   68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Mapping of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in 270 Patients with a PSA Level of Less Than 1.0 ng/mL: Impact on Salvage Radiotherapy Planning [J].
Calais, Jeremie ;
Czernin, Johannes ;
Cao, Minsong ;
Kishan, Amar U. ;
Hegde, John V. ;
Shaverdian, Narek ;
Sandler, Kiri ;
Chu, Fang-I ;
King, Chris R. ;
Steinberg, Michael L. ;
Rauscher, Isabel ;
Schmidt-Hegemann, Nina-Sophie ;
Poeppel, Thorsten ;
Hetkamp, Philipp ;
Ceci, Francesco ;
Herrmann, Ken ;
Fendler, Wolfgang P. ;
Eiber, Matthias ;
Nickols, Nicholas G. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 59 (02) :230-237
[4]   Evaluation of suspected soft tissue lesion in the prostate bed after radical prostatectomy using 3 T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Cha, Dongik ;
Kim, Chan Kyo ;
Park, Sung Yoon ;
Park, Jung Jae ;
Park, Byung Kwan .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 33 (04) :407-412
[5]   Intraindividual Comparison of 18F-PSMA-1007 with Renally Excreted PSMA Ligands for PSMA PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer [J].
Dietlein, Felix ;
Kobe, Carsten ;
Hohberg, Melanie ;
Zlatopolskiy, Boris D. ;
Krapf, Philipp ;
Endepols, Heike ;
Taeger, Philipp ;
Hammes, Jochen ;
Heidenreich, Axel ;
Persigehl, Thorsten ;
Neumaier, Bernd ;
Drzezga, Alexander ;
Dietlein, Markus .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 61 (05) :729-734
[6]  
EAU Guidelines, 2020, P EAU ANN C AMST NET
[7]   Comparison of MRI, PET, and 18F-choline PET/MRI in patients with oligometastatic recurrent prostate cancer [J].
Evangelista, Laura ;
Cassarino, Gianluca ;
Lauro, Alberto ;
Morlacco, Alessandro ;
Sepulcri, Matteo ;
Nguyen, Alex Ahn Li ;
Ietto, Francesco ;
Cecchin, Diego ;
Lacognata, Carmelo ;
Zucchetta, Pietro .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (09) :4401-4409
[8]   Utility of Choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Lymph Node Involvement Identification in Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Evangelista, Laura ;
Guttilla, Andrea ;
Zattoni, Fabio ;
Muzzio, Pier Carlo ;
Zattoni, Filiberto .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (06) :1040-1048
[9]   Prostate cancer-specific PET radiotracers: A review on the clinical utility in recurrent disease [J].
Evans, Jaden D. ;
Jethwa, Krishan R. ;
Ost, Piet ;
Williams, Scott ;
Kwon, Eugene D. ;
Lowe, Val J. ;
Davis, Brian J. .
PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8 (01) :28-39
[10]   Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy in Localizing Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Single-Arm Clinical Trial [J].
Fendler, Wolfgang P. ;
Calais, Jeremie ;
Eiber, Matthias ;
Flavell, Robert R. ;
Mishoe, Ashley ;
Feng, Felix Y. ;
Nguyen, Hao G. ;
Reiter, Robert E. ;
Rettig, Matthew B. ;
Okamoto, Shozo ;
Emmett, Louise ;
Zacho, Helle D. ;
Ilhan, Harun ;
Wetter, Axel ;
Rischpler, Christoph ;
Schoder, Heiko ;
Burger, Irene A. ;
Gartmann, Jeannine ;
Smith, Raven ;
Small, Eric J. ;
Slavik, Roger ;
Carroll, Peter R. ;
Herrmann, Ken ;
Czernin, Johannes ;
Hope, Thomas A. .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (06) :856-863