Differences between Disaster Prediction and Risk Assessment in Natural Disasters

被引:3
作者
Huang, Chongfu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Earth Surface Processes & Resources, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Acad Disaster Reduct & Emergency Management, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resources Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Minist Educ China, Key Lab Environm Change & Nat Disaster, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[4] Minist Civil Affairs, Acad Disaster Reduct & Emergency Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Minist Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | 2011年 / 17卷 / 03期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
disaster prediction; risk assessment; probability; scene; earthquake; SEISMIC RISK; HAZARD; REGION;
D O I
10.1080/10807039.2011.571069
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A clear distinction between disaster prediction and risk assessment is necessary for effective disaster reduction. Disaster prediction models objects that face hazard, damage, or loss, while risk assessment models the likelihoods of the scene in future adverse incidents. In terms of mathematics, a model for disaster prediction can be an explicit function, while a model for risk assessment might be an implicit function. There are at least three criteria to judge whether a model is suitable for risk assessment: (i) available information is incomplete, (ii) the scene in the future is very uncertain, and (iii) the model depends on comparing the current situation with some known patterns. In this article, we use the case of an earthquake to show the difference between disaster prediction and risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 553
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Accommodating uncertainty in comparative risk [J].
Andrews, CI ;
Hassenzahl, DM ;
Johnson, BB .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2004, 24 (05) :1323-1335
[2]   Loss estimation in Istanbul based on deterministic earthquake scenarios of the Marmara Sea region (Turkey) [J].
Ansal, A. ;
Akinci, A. ;
Cultrera, G. ;
Erdik, M. ;
Pessina, V. ;
Tonuk, G. ;
Ameri, G. .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2009, 29 (04) :699-709
[3]   How useful is quantitative risk assessment? [J].
Apostolakis, GE .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2004, 24 (03) :515-520
[4]  
BONNER C, 2000, FEAR PROFITEERS DO S
[5]  
Calow P., 1998, Handbook of environmental risk assessment and management
[6]  
Campbell Marnie L., 2009, V204, P353
[7]   Fuzzy risks and an updating algorithm with new observations [J].
Chongfu Huang ;
Da Ruan .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2008, 28 (03) :681-694
[8]  
CORNELL CA, 1968, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V58, P1583
[9]  
*EEA, 2010, ENV TERM DISC SERV
[10]   Integrated risk assessment and management: overview and state of the art [J].
Fedra, K .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1998, 61 (1-3) :5-22