Desarda vs lichtenstein technique for the treatment of primary inguinal hernia

被引:1
|
作者
Arafa, Ahmed S. [1 ]
Saad, Hassan A. [1 ]
Fayek, Fady [1 ]
机构
[1] Zagazig Univ, Zagazig Univ Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Zagazig 44511, Sharkia Provinc, Egypt
来源
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2020年 / 39卷 / 01期
关键词
Desarda technique; inguinal hernia; Lichtenstein technique; tissue-based repair; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; REPAIR; HERNIORRHAPHY; PAIN;
D O I
10.4103/ejs.ejs_165_19
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The Lichtenstein technique (LT) is currently the most popular open mesh repair method with recurrence rates of around 4% in long-term follow-up, but the cost of the mesh may be a barrier in developing and underdeveloped countries. Also, the presence of an infection can prevent implantation of a mesh. In these settings, it is good to have the option of a simple, mesh-free repair. Desarda, in 2001, has described a new method that seems to satisfy the above criteria. Desarda technique (DT) appeared as a promising tissue-based repair that provided low incidence of recurrence without the need for complicated dissection, suturing or implanting prosthetic or foreign materials in the inguinal canal. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the DT is as effective as the standard LT, allowing successful hernia repair without mesh. Materials and methods A total of 80 cases were allocated into two groups. The Desarda group (D group) had 40 patients and the Lichtenstein group (L group) had 40 patients. The primary outcome measures were the recurrence of inguinal hernia and chronic groin. Secondary outcome measures included operating time (min), time to return to normal gait and to work, foreign body sensation in the groin, and postoperative complications such as testicular edema, groin discomfort, seroma, and surgical site infections. Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Results There was significantly shorter operating time and earlier return to normal gait in favor of Desarda repair. Complication rates were nearly similar in the two study arms. Conclusion Both DT and LT provided satisfactory treatment for primary inguinal hernia with low recurrence rates and acceptable rates of complications that were significantly less after DT. The DT may potentially increase the number of tissue-based methods available for treating groin hernias. More well-designed RCTs with longer follow-up are required for further validation of the DT.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 165
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Study To Assess Desarda Vs Lichtenstein Technique For The Treatment Of Primary Inguinal Hernia
    Paliwal, Sagar Shyamsunder
    Katkar, Aakash
    Nangare, Dr Nitin
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL NEGATIVE RESULTS, 2022, 13 : 438 - 440
  • [2] Desarda versus Lichtenstein technique for the treatment of primary inguinal hernia: A systematic review
    Ge, Hua
    Liang, Chaojie
    Xu, Yingchen
    Ren, Shulin
    Wu, Jixiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 50 : 22 - 27
  • [3] Desarda's Repair Vs Lichtenstein Repair in Indirect Inguinal Hernia Preferred technique
    Ali, Kamran
    Ahmad, Shabbir
    Kareemullah, Muhammad
    Ali, Farman
    Farooq, Qasim
    Karim, Fawad
    Azhar, Faryal
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (12): : 3225 - 3226
  • [4] Randomized clinical trial of Desarda versus Lichtenstein repair for treatment of primary inguinal hernia
    Youssef, Tamer
    El-Alfy, Khaled
    Farid, Mohamed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 20 : 28 - 34
  • [5] Desarda Versus Lichtenstein Technique for Primary Inguinal Hernia Treatment: 3-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Jacek Szopinski
    Stanislaw Dabrowiecki
    Stanislaw Pierscinski
    Marek Jackowski
    Maciej Jaworski
    Zbigniew Szuflet
    World Journal of Surgery, 2012, 36 : 984 - 992
  • [6] Desarda Versus Lichtenstein Technique for Primary Inguinal Hernia Treatment: 3-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Szopinski, Jacek
    Dabrowiecki, Stanislaw
    Pierscinski, Stanislaw
    Jackowski, Marek
    Jaworski, Maciej
    Szuflet, Zbigniew
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 36 (05) : 984 - 992
  • [7] Lichtenstein Versus Desarda Technique for Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Ahmed, Habib
    Nazir, Muhammad Tariq
    Irfan, Fakhar
    Murtaza, Mudassar
    Khan, Ashfaq Nasir
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 14 (02): : 527 - 530
  • [8] Desarda's technique versus Lichtenstein technique for the treatment of primary inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Emile, S. H.
    Elfeki, H.
    HERNIA, 2018, 22 (03) : 385 - 395
  • [9] Desarda’s technique versus Lichtenstein technique for the treatment of primary inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    S. H. Emile
    H. Elfeki
    Hernia, 2018, 22 : 385 - 395
  • [10] COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LICHTENSTEIN VERSUS DESARDA REPAIR FOR INGUINAL HERNIA
    Sowmya, G. R.
    Udapudi, Deepak G.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (97): : 16261 - 16265