What are the Key Indicators of Mega Sustainable Construction Projects? A Stakeholder-Network Perspective

被引:23
作者
Wu, Guangdong [1 ]
Qiang, Guofeng [1 ]
Zuo, Jian [2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Xianbo [4 ]
Chang, Ruidong [5 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Dept Construct Management, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, ECIC, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[4] Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Engn & Technol, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
[5] Bond Univ, Fac Soc & Design, Ctr Comparat Construct Res, Gold Coast 4226, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
MSCPs; stakeholders; evaluation indicator; social network analysis; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY; RISKS; METHODOLOGY; RESILIENCE; RESOURCES; FRAMEWORK; INDEX; ISEW;
D O I
10.3390/su10082939
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mega sustainable construction projects (MSCPs) require complex system engineering. There are various indicators available to evaluate sustainable construction, and it is difficult to determine which the key indicators are among them. Existing studies do not adequately consider the stakeholders associated with the indicators of sustainable construction, leading to key decision-makers' lack of targeted management strategies to improve the sustainability level of MSCPs. Using literature analysis and expert interviews, this study identified the key evaluation indicators of MSCPs from a stakeholder-network perspective. Social network analysis (SNA) was used to explore the relationships between the key evaluation indicators and corresponding stakeholders. The results showed that the government and designers significantly impacted other stakeholders and played as the key stakeholders in MSCPs. Regarding the indicators, applying energy-saving and intelligent technologies plays a key role in the MSCPs. This study links key indicators of MSCPs with the associated stakeholders, which helps decision-makers to develop targeted strategies to improve the sustainability level of MSCPs, thereby not only improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the intervention strategies, but also helping to save decision-makers' monetary and human resources which are usually limited.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Ahn Y.H., 2013, INT J SUSTAINABLE BU, V4, P35, DOI DOI 10.1080/2093761X.2012.759887
[2]   From natural resources and environmental accounting to construction of indicators for sustainable development [J].
Alfsen, Knut H. ;
Greaker, Mads .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 61 (04) :600-610
[3]   Strategic sustainable development in the UK construction industry, through the framework for strategic sustainable development, using Building Information Modelling [J].
Alwan, Zaid ;
Jones, Paul ;
Holgate, Peter .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 :349-358
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, ENG MANAG J, DOI DOI 10.1080/10429247.2002.11415180
[5]  
[Anonymous], WIT T ECOL ENV
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, INT J SOC MAT ENG RE, DOI [10.5188/ijsmer.17.99, DOI 10.5188/IJSMER.17.99]
[8]  
ATOMBO C., 2015, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, V4, P13
[9]   Integrating and optimizing metrics of sustainable building performance using human-focused agent-based modeling [J].
Azar, Elie ;
Nikolopoulou, Christina ;
Papadopoulos, Sokratis .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 183 :926-937
[10]   Building a conceptual framework for measuring business performance in construction: an empirical evaluation [J].
Bassioni, H. A. ;
Price, A. D. F. ;
Hassan, T. M. .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2005, 23 (05) :495-507