Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors

被引:89
作者
Mizushima, Takeshi [1 ,2 ]
Kato, Mototsugu [2 ]
Iwanaga, Ichiro [1 ]
Sato, Fumiyuki [1 ]
Kubo, Kimitoshi [1 ]
Ehira, Nobuyuki [1 ]
Uebayashi, Minoru [1 ]
Ono, Shouko [2 ]
Nakagawa, Manabu [2 ]
Mabe, Katsuhiro [2 ]
Shimizu, Yuichi [2 ]
Sakamoto, Naoya [3 ]
机构
[1] Kitami Red Cross Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Kitami, Hokkaido, Japan
[2] Hokkaido Univ Hosp, Div Endoscopy, Kita Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608648, Japan
[3] Hokkaido Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608648, Japan
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2015年 / 29卷 / 01期
关键词
Colorectal tumor; ESD; Perforation; Risk factor; Fibrosis; Technical difficulty; LATERALLY SPREADING TUMORS; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-014-3665-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted treatment for colorectal tumors, but is technically more difficult and has a higher risk of complications such as perforation than gastric ESD. Few studies have investigated the factors associated with technical difficulty and perforation in colorectal ESD. This study aimed to evaluate the technical difficulty according to location, and the risk factors for perforation, in colorectal ESD. This retrospective study included 134 consecutive colorectal tumors treated by ESD in 122 patients at the Division of Endoscopy of Hokkaido University Hospital and the Department of Gastroenterology of Kitami Red Cross Hospital from November 2011 to February 2013. To evaluate the technical difficulty of performing ESD for colorectal tumors at specific locations, the en bloc R0 resection rate, specimen diameter, procedure speed, and procedure time were compared among tumor locations using the chi (2) test or analysis of variance. Risk factors for perforation were identified by multiple logistic regression analysis. The en bloc R0 resection rate was 86.6 % (116/134), the mean tumor diameter was 27.1 mm, and the mean procedure time was 63.5 min. The mean speed of procedures was significantly slower in the sigmoid colon (24.7 min/cm(2)) than in other areas. Perforation occurred in nine cases (6.7 %). Submucosal fibrosis was the only factor independently associated with perforation (odds ratio 5.684, 95 % confidence interval 1.307-24.727). ESD was slower for sigmoid colon tumors than for tumors in other areas, suggesting that ESD was technically more difficult in the sigmoid colon than in other colorectal areas. Submucosal fibrosis was independently associated with perforation during colorectal ESD.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 139
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in elderly people [J].
Yoshida, Naohisa ;
Naito, Yuji ;
Sakai, Kyoko ;
Sumida, Yoshio ;
Kanemasa, Kazuyuki ;
Inoue, Ken ;
Morimoto, Yasutaka ;
Konishi, Hideyuki ;
Wakabayashi, Naoki ;
Kokura, Satoshi ;
Yagi, Nobuaki ;
Yanagisawa, Akio ;
Yoshikawa, Toshikazu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 25 (04) :455-461
[32]   Risk factors for intraoperative and delayed perforation related with gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection [J].
Mimura, Takuya ;
Yamamoto, Yoshinobu ;
Suzuki, Haruhisa ;
Takizawa, Kohei ;
Hirasawa, Toshiaki ;
Takeuchi, Yoji ;
Ishido, Kenji ;
Hoteya, Shu ;
Yano, Tomonori ;
Tanaka, Shinji ;
Kudara, Norihiko ;
Nakagawa, Masahiro ;
Mashimo, Yumi ;
Ishigooka, Masahiro ;
Fukase, Kazutoshi ;
Shimazu, Taichi ;
Ono, Hiroyuki ;
Tanabe, Satoshi ;
Kondo, Hitoshi ;
Iishi, Hiroyasu ;
Ninomiya, Motoki ;
Oda, Ichiro .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 39 (07) :1358-1366
[33]   Lesion size affects the risk of technical difficulty in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection [J].
Zhao, Yuqi ;
Pan, Xiaogao ;
Chen, Yihan ;
Tan, Yuyong ;
Liu, Deliang .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
[34]   Establishing a nomogram for predicting the risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors [J].
Bian, Fucheng ;
Li, Kunshi ;
Bian, Guangyu ;
Li, Xiumei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2024, 39 (01)
[35]   Predictive factors for technically difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection in large colorectal tumors [J].
He, Yuqi ;
Wang, Xin ;
Du, Yongqiang ;
Yung, Victoria Yee-Wa ;
Jin, Peng ;
Sheng, Jianqiu .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 27 (06) :541-546
[36]   Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors [J].
Hulagu, Sadettin ;
Senturk, Omer ;
Korkmaz, Ugur ;
Sirin, Goktug ;
Duman, Ali Erkan ;
Dindar, Gokhan ;
Celebi, Altay ;
Ogutmen Koc, Deniz ;
Bozkurt, Neslihan ;
Yilmaz, Hasan ;
Gurbuz, Yesim ;
Duman, Deniz ;
Tarcin, Orhan .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 24 (06) :532-540
[37]   CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES OF ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR COLORECTAL TUMORS [J].
Tanaka, Shinji ;
Terasaki, Motomi ;
Kanao, Hiroyuki ;
Oka, Shiro ;
Chayama, Kazuaki .
DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 24 :73-79
[38]   Comparing endoscopic mucosal resection with endoscopic submucosal dissection: the different endoscopic techniques for colorectal tumors [J].
Chao, Guanqun ;
Zhang, Shuo ;
Si, Jianmin .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 202 (01) :204-215
[39]   Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent colorectal tumors after endoscopic mucosal resection [J].
Suzuki, T. ;
Kitagawa, Y. ;
Nankinzan, R. ;
Hara, T. ;
Yamaguchi, T. .
ACTA GASTRO-ENTEROLOGICA BELGICA, 2019, 82 (03) :375-378
[40]   ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION (ESD) FOR COLORECTAL TUMORS [J].
Saito, Yutaka ;
Sakamoto, Taku ;
Fukunaga, Shusei ;
Nakajima, Takeshi ;
Kuriyama, Shinsuke ;
Matsuda, Takahisa .
DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 21 :S7-S12