Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors

被引:89
作者
Mizushima, Takeshi [1 ,2 ]
Kato, Mototsugu [2 ]
Iwanaga, Ichiro [1 ]
Sato, Fumiyuki [1 ]
Kubo, Kimitoshi [1 ]
Ehira, Nobuyuki [1 ]
Uebayashi, Minoru [1 ]
Ono, Shouko [2 ]
Nakagawa, Manabu [2 ]
Mabe, Katsuhiro [2 ]
Shimizu, Yuichi [2 ]
Sakamoto, Naoya [3 ]
机构
[1] Kitami Red Cross Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Kitami, Hokkaido, Japan
[2] Hokkaido Univ Hosp, Div Endoscopy, Kita Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608648, Japan
[3] Hokkaido Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608648, Japan
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2015年 / 29卷 / 01期
关键词
Colorectal tumor; ESD; Perforation; Risk factor; Fibrosis; Technical difficulty; LATERALLY SPREADING TUMORS; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-014-3665-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted treatment for colorectal tumors, but is technically more difficult and has a higher risk of complications such as perforation than gastric ESD. Few studies have investigated the factors associated with technical difficulty and perforation in colorectal ESD. This study aimed to evaluate the technical difficulty according to location, and the risk factors for perforation, in colorectal ESD. This retrospective study included 134 consecutive colorectal tumors treated by ESD in 122 patients at the Division of Endoscopy of Hokkaido University Hospital and the Department of Gastroenterology of Kitami Red Cross Hospital from November 2011 to February 2013. To evaluate the technical difficulty of performing ESD for colorectal tumors at specific locations, the en bloc R0 resection rate, specimen diameter, procedure speed, and procedure time were compared among tumor locations using the chi (2) test or analysis of variance. Risk factors for perforation were identified by multiple logistic regression analysis. The en bloc R0 resection rate was 86.6 % (116/134), the mean tumor diameter was 27.1 mm, and the mean procedure time was 63.5 min. The mean speed of procedures was significantly slower in the sigmoid colon (24.7 min/cm(2)) than in other areas. Perforation occurred in nine cases (6.7 %). Submucosal fibrosis was the only factor independently associated with perforation (odds ratio 5.684, 95 % confidence interval 1.307-24.727). ESD was slower for sigmoid colon tumors than for tumors in other areas, suggesting that ESD was technically more difficult in the sigmoid colon than in other colorectal areas. Submucosal fibrosis was independently associated with perforation during colorectal ESD.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 139
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors [J].
Chow, Chi Woo Samuel ;
Fung, Tak Lit Derek ;
Chan, Pak Tat ;
Kwok, Kam Hung .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (02) :1293-1302
[22]   Impact of endoscopic submucosal dissection for the therapeutic strategy of large colorectal tumors [J].
Hotta, Kinichi ;
Saito, Yutaka ;
Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro ;
Ikehara, Hisatomo ;
Ikematsu, Hiroaki ;
Kobayashi, Nozomu ;
Sakamoto, Naoto ;
Takeuchi, Yoji ;
Uraoka, Toshio ;
Yamaguchi, Yuichiro .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 (03) :510-515
[23]   The Derivation and External Validation of a Fibrosis Risk Model for Colorectal Tumours Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection [J].
Sferrazza, Sandro ;
Maida, Marcello ;
Calabrese, Giulio ;
Facciorusso, Antonio ;
Fuccio, Lorenzo ;
Frazzoni, Leonardo ;
Maselli, Roberta ;
Repici, Alessandro ;
Di Mitri, Roberto ;
Santos-Antunes, Joao .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (15)
[24]   CURRENT OPINIONS FOR ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR COLORECTAL TUMORS FROM OUR EXPERIENCES: INDICATIONS, TECHNICAL ASPECTS AND COMPLICATIONS [J].
Hotta, Kinichi ;
Yamaguchi, Yuichiro ;
Saito, Yutaka ;
Takao, Toshitatsu ;
Ono, Hiroyuki .
DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 24 :110-116
[25]   Factors of technical difficulty in conventional and traction-assisted esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection [J].
Mitsui, Tomohiro ;
Kadota, Tomohiro ;
Wakabayashi, Masashi ;
Nakajo, Keiichiro ;
Shinmura, Kensuke ;
Sunakawa, Hironori ;
Sato, Daiki ;
Minamide, Tatsunori ;
Takashima, Kenji ;
Murano, Tatsuro ;
Yoda, Yusuke ;
Ikematsu, Hiroaki ;
Yano, Tomonori .
ESOPHAGUS, 2022, 19 (03) :452-459
[26]   Endoscopic and Clinical Factors Affecting the Prognosis of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection-Related Perforation [J].
Kang, Dong-Uk ;
Choi, Yunsik ;
Lee, Ho-Su ;
Lee, Hyo Jeong ;
Park, Sang Hyoung ;
Yang, Dong-Hoon ;
Yoon, Soon Man ;
Kim, Kyung-Jo ;
Ye, Byong Duk ;
Myung, Seung-Jae ;
Yang, Suk-Kyun ;
Kim, Jin-Ho ;
Byeon, Jeong-Sik .
GUT AND LIVER, 2016, 10 (03) :420-428
[27]   Risk factors for unsuccessful colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Gu, Feng ;
Jiang, Wei ;
Zhu, Jingyi ;
Ma, Lei ;
He, Boyuan ;
Zhai, Huihong .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2024, 56 (08) :1288-1297
[28]   Criteria for Non-Surgical Treatment of Perforation during Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection [J].
Hotta, Kinichi ;
Shinohara, Tomoaki ;
Oyama, Tsuneo ;
Ishii, Eiji ;
Tomori, Akihisa ;
Takahashi, Akiko ;
Miyata, Yoshinori .
DIGESTION, 2012, 85 (02) :116-120
[29]   Predictors of technical difficulty during endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal cancer [J].
Hazama, Hiromasa ;
Tanaka, Masaki ;
Kakushima, Naomi ;
Yabuuchi, Yohei ;
Yoshida, Masao ;
Kawata, Noboru ;
Takizawa, Kohei ;
Ito, Sayo ;
Imai, Kenichiro ;
Hotta, Kinichi ;
Ishiwatari, Hirotoshi ;
Matsubayashi, Hiroyuki ;
Mori, Keita ;
Ono, Hiroyuki .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (09) :2909-2915
[30]   Preoperative endoscopic predictors of severe submucosal fibrosis in colorectal tumors undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection [J].
Kaosombatwattana, Uayporn ;
Yamamura, Takeshi ;
Limsrivilai, Julajak ;
Nakamura, Masanao ;
Leelakusolvong, Somchai ;
Hirooka, Yoshiki ;
Goto, Hidemi .
ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2019, 7 (04) :E421-E430