A genomic comparison of two termites with different social complexity

被引:51
作者
Korb, Judith [1 ]
Poulsen, Michael [2 ]
Hu, Haofu [3 ]
Li, Cai [3 ,4 ]
Boomsma, Jacobus J. [2 ]
Zhang, Guojie [2 ,3 ]
Liebig, Juergen [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Inst Biol 1, Dept Evolutionary Biol & Ecol, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Social Evolut, Dept Biol, Sect Ecol & Evolut, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] BGI Shenzhen, China Natl Genebank, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Nat Hist Museum Denmark, Ctr GeoGenet, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ USA
关键词
IONOTROPIC GLUTAMATE RECEPTORS; TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; GENE-EXPRESSION; IMMUNE-SYSTEM; WORKER CASTE; EVOLUTION; SELECTION; INSECT; ANTIFUNGAL; ISOPTERA;
D O I
10.3389/fgene.2015.00009
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The termites evolved eusociality and complex societies before the ants, but have been studied much less. The recent publication of the first two termite genomes provides a unique comparative opportunity, particularly because the sequenced termites represent opposite ends of the social complexity spectrum. Zootermopsis nevadensis has simple colonies with totipotent workers that can develop into all castes (dispersing reproductives, nest-inheriting replacement reproductives, and soldiers). In contrast, the fungus-growing termite Macrotermes natalensis belongs to the higher termites and has very large and complex societies with morphologically distinct castes that are life-time sterile. Here we compare key characteristics of genomic architecture, focusing on genes involved in communication, immune defenses, mating biology and symbiosis that were likely important in termite social evolution. We discuss these in relation to what is known about these genes in the ants and outline hypothesis for further testing.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
Abe T., 1987, P125
[2]   The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster [J].
Adams, MD ;
Celniker, SE ;
Holt, RA ;
Evans, CA ;
Gocayne, JD ;
Amanatides, PG ;
Scherer, SE ;
Li, PW ;
Hoskins, RA ;
Galle, RF ;
George, RA ;
Lewis, SE ;
Richards, S ;
Ashburner, M ;
Henderson, SN ;
Sutton, GG ;
Wortman, JR ;
Yandell, MD ;
Zhang, Q ;
Chen, LX ;
Brandon, RC ;
Rogers, YHC ;
Blazej, RG ;
Champe, M ;
Pfeiffer, BD ;
Wan, KH ;
Doyle, C ;
Baxter, EG ;
Helt, G ;
Nelson, CR ;
Miklos, GLG ;
Abril, JF ;
Agbayani, A ;
An, HJ ;
Andrews-Pfannkoch, C ;
Baldwin, D ;
Ballew, RM ;
Basu, A ;
Baxendale, J ;
Bayraktaroglu, L ;
Beasley, EM ;
Beeson, KY ;
Benos, PV ;
Berman, BP ;
Bhandari, D ;
Bolshakov, S ;
Borkova, D ;
Botchan, MR ;
Bouck, J ;
Brokstein, P .
SCIENCE, 2000, 287 (5461) :2185-2195
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1985, CASTE DIFFERENTIATIO
[4]   Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences [J].
Benson, G .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1999, 27 (02) :573-580
[5]   Variant Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors as Chemosensory Receptors in Drosophila [J].
Benton, Richard ;
Vannice, Kirsten S. ;
Gomez-Diaz, Carolina ;
Vosshall, Leslie B. .
CELL, 2009, 136 (01) :149-162
[6]   Genomic Comparison of the Ants Camponotus floridanus and Harpegnathos saltator [J].
Bonasio, Roberto ;
Zhang, Guojie ;
Ye, Chaoyang ;
Mutti, Navdeep S. ;
Fang, Xiaodong ;
Qin, Nan ;
Donahue, Greg ;
Yang, Pengcheng ;
Li, Qiye ;
Li, Cai ;
Zhang, Pei ;
Huang, Zhiyong ;
Berger, Shelley L. ;
Reinberg, Danny ;
Wang, Jun ;
Liebig, Juergen .
SCIENCE, 2010, 329 (5995) :1068-1071
[7]  
Boomsma J.J., 2005, P139, DOI 10.1079/9780851998121.0139
[8]   Beyond promiscuity: mate-choice commitments in social breeding [J].
Boomsma, Jacobus J. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 368 (1613)
[9]  
Brugerolle G, 2006, SOIL BIOL, P243
[10]   Symbiotic digestion of lignocellulose in termite guts [J].
Brune, Andreas .
NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 12 (03) :168-180