Validation of a multi-marker model for the prediction of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: Combined results of the Inter99 and Botnia studies

被引:15
作者
Lyssenko, Valeria [2 ]
Jorgensen, Torben [3 ,4 ]
Gerwien, Robert W. [1 ]
Hansens, Torben [5 ]
Rowe, Michael W. [1 ]
McKenna, Michael P. [1 ]
Kolberg, Janice [1 ]
Pedersen, Oluf [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Borch-Johnsen, Knut [6 ,8 ]
Groop, Leif [2 ]
机构
[1] Tethys Biosci, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci Diabet & Endocrinol, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Glostrup Cty Hosp, Res Ctr Prevent & Hlth, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Hagedorn Res Lab, DK-2820 Gentofte, Denmark
[6] Univ Aarhus, Fac Hlth Sci, Aarhus, Denmark
[7] Univ Copenhagen, Marie Krogh Ctr Metab Res, Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Univ So Denmark, Res Ctr Qual Hlth Care, Inst Publ Hlth, Odense, Denmark
基金
瑞典研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Biomarkers; Diabetes Risk Score; incident diabetes; risk assessment; type 2 diabetes mellitus; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE; HIGH-RISK; PROGRESSION; ADULTS; SCORE; AREA;
D O I
10.1177/1479164111424762
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess performance of a biomarker-based score that predicts the five-year risk of diabetes (Diabetes Risk Score, DRS) in an independent cohort that included 15-year follow-up. Method: DRS was developed on the Inter99 cohort, and validated on the Botnia cohort. Performance was benchmarked against other risk-assessment tools comparing calibration, time to event analysis, and net reclassification. Results: The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.84 for the Inter99 cohort and 0.78 for the Botnia cohort. In the Botnia cohort, DRS provided better discrimination than fasting plasma glucose (FPG), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, oral glucose tolerance test or risk scores derived from Framingham or San Antonio Study cohorts. Overall reclassification with DRS was significantly better than using FPG and glucose tolerance status (p < 0.0001). In time to event analysis, rates of conversion to diabetes in low, moderate, and high DRS groups were significantly different (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study validates DRS performance in an independent population, and provides a more accurate assessment of T2DM risk than other methods.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 67
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], APPL LOGISTIC REGRES
[2]  
[Anonymous], 6 WORLD C PREV DIAB
[3]   Orchestration of glucose homeostasis - From a small acorn to the California oak [J].
Bergman, Richard N. .
DIABETES, 2007, 56 (06) :1489-1501
[4]   Preservation of pancreatic β-cell function and prevention of type 2 diabetes by pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance in high-risk Hispanic women [J].
Buchanan, TA ;
Xiang, AH ;
Peters, RK ;
Kjos, SL ;
Marroquin, A ;
Goico, J ;
Ochoa, C ;
Tan, S ;
Berkowitz, K ;
Hodis, HN ;
Azen, SP .
DIABETES, 2002, 51 (09) :2796-2803
[5]   From the Triumvirate to the Ominous Octet: A New Paradigm for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [J].
DeFronzo, Ralph A. .
DIABETES, 2009, 58 (04) :773-795
[6]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[7]   Predictors of progression from impaired glucose tolerance to NIDDM - An analysis of six prospective studies [J].
Edelstein, SL ;
Knowler, WC ;
Bain, RP ;
Andres, R ;
BarrettConnor, EL ;
Dowse, GK ;
Haffner, SM ;
Pettitt, DJ ;
Sorkin, JD ;
Muller, DC ;
Collins, VR ;
Hamman, RF .
DIABETES, 1997, 46 (04) :701-710
[8]  
Gavin JR, 1997, DIABETES CARE, V20, P1183
[9]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[10]   A NEW AND SIMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE TO IDENTITY PEOPLE AT INCREASED RISK FOR UNDIAGNOSED DIABETES [J].
HERMAN, WH ;
SMITH, PJ ;
THOMPSON, TJ ;
ENGELGAU, MM ;
AUBERT, RE .
DIABETES CARE, 1995, 18 (03) :382-387