Detection of central visual field defects in early glaucomatous eyes: Comparison of Humphrey and Octopus perimetry

被引：26

作者：

Roberti, Gloria ^{[1
]}

Manni, Gianluca ^{[1
,2
]}

Riva, Ivano ^{[1
]}

Hollo, Gabor ^{[3
]}

Quaranta, Luciano ^{[4
]}

Agnifili, Luca ^{[5
]}

Figus, Michele ^{[6
]}

Giammaria, Sara ^{[7
]}

Rastelli, Davide ^{[2
]}

Oddone, Francesco ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] IRCSS Fdn GB Bietti, Rome, Italy

[2] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, DSCMT, Rome, Italy

[3] Semmelweis Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Budapest, Hungary

[4] Univ Brescia, Sect Ophthalmol, Dept Med & Surg Specialties, Radiol Sci & Publ Hlth, Brescia, Italy

[5] G dAnnunzio Univ Chieti Pescara, Ophthalmol Clin, Dept Med & Aging Sci, Chieti, Italy

[6] Univ Pisa, Dept Neurosci, Pisa, Italy

[7] Univ Rome Campus Biomed, Rome, Italy

来源：

PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 10期

关键词：

OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; RETINAL VESSEL TRUNK; DAMAGE; PATTERN; POINTS; MACULA;

D O I：

10.1371/journal.pone.0186793

中图分类号：

O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];

学科分类号：

07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;

摘要：

Purpose To compare the detection rate of central visual field defect (CVFD) between the 30-degree Octopus G1 program (Dynamic strategy) and the HFA 10-2 SITA-Standard test in early glaucoma eyes not showing any CVFD on the HFA 24-2 SITA-Standard test. Methods One eye of 41 early glaucoma patients without CVFD in the central 10 degrees on HFA 24-2 test was tested with both the HFA 10-2 test and the Octopus G1 program 15 minutes apart, in random order. The primary outcome measure was the comparison of CVFD detection rates. Secondary outcome measures comprised the agreement in detecting CVFD, and the comparison of test durations and the numbers of depressed test points outside the central 10-degree area between the HFA 24-2 test and the Octopus G1 program. Results The mean age of the population was 65.2-10.1 years, and the mean deviation with HFA 24-2 was -3.26-2.6 dB. The mean test duration was not significantly different between the tests (p = 0.13). A CVFD was present in 33 (80.4%) HFA 10-2 test and in 23 (56.0%) Octopus G1 tests (p = 0.002). The overall agreement between the HFA 10-2 and Octopus G1 examinations in classifying eyes as having or not having CVFD was moderate (Cohen's kappa 0.47). The Octopus G1 program showed 69.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity to detect CVFD in eyes where the HFA 10-2 test revealed a CVFD. The number of depressed test points (p<5%) outside the central 10 degrees area detected with the Octopus G1 program (19.68-10.6) was significantly higher than that detected with the HFA 24-2 program (11.95-5.5, p<0.001). Conclusion Both HFA 10-2 and Octopus G1programs showed CVFD not present at HFA 24-2 test although the agreement was moderate. The use of a single Octopus G1 examination may represent a practical compromise for the assessment of both central and peripheral visual field up to 30 degrees eccentricity without any additional testing and increasing the total investigation time.

引用

页数：10

共 22 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2010, HUMPHR FIELD AN 2 I

[2] Mapping Glaucoma Patients' 30-2 and 10-2 Visual Fields Reveals Clusters of Test Points Damaged in the 10-2 Grid That Are Not Sampled in the Sparse 30-2 Grid [J].