Estimation and comparison of effective dose (E) in standard chest CT by organ dose measurements and dose-length-product methods and assessment of the influence of CT tube potential (energy dependency) on effective dose in a dual-source CT

被引:24
作者
Paul, Jijo [1 ,2 ]
Banckwitz, Rosemarie [3 ]
Krauss, Bernhard [3 ]
Vogl, Thomas J. [1 ]
Maentele, Werner [2 ]
Bauer, Ralf W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Dept Biophys, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Siemens Healthcare, D-91301 Forchheim, Germany
关键词
Effective dose (E); Organ dose; Thermo luminescent dosimetry; Dual-energy; High-pitch; PROTECTION; RADIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.06.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine effective dose (E) during standard chest CT using an organ dose-based and a dose-length-product-based (DLP) approach for four different scan protocols including high-pitch and dual-energy in a dual-source CT scanner of the second generation. Materials and methods: Organ doses were measured with thermo luminescence dosimeters (TLD) in an anthropomorphic male adult phantom. Further, DLP-based dose estimates were performed by using the standard 0.014 mSv/ mGycm conversion coefficient k. Examinations were performed on a dual-source CT system (Somatom Definition Flash, Siemens). Four scan protocols were investigated: (1) single-source 120 kV, (2) single-source 100 kV, (3) high-pitch 120 kV, and (4) dual-energy with 100/ Sn140 kV with equivalent CTDIvol and no automated tube current modulation. E was then determined following recommendations of ICRP publication 103 and 60 and specific k values were derived. Results: DLP-based estimates differed by 4.5-16.56% and 5.2-15.8% relatively to ICRP 60 and 103, respectively. The derived k factors calculated from TLD measurements were 0.0148, 0.015, 0.0166, and 0.0148 for protocol 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Effective dose estimations by ICRP 103 and 60 for single-energy and dual-energy protocols show a difference of less than 0.04 mSv. Conclusion: Estimates of E based on DLP work equally well for single-energy, high-pitch and dual-energy CT examinations. The tube potential definitely affects effective dose in a substantial way. Effective dose estimations by ICRP 103 and 60 for both single-energy and dual-energy examinations differ not more than 0.04 mSv. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E507 / E512
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 96 AAPM
[2]  
BONGARTZ G, 2004, 2004 CT QUALITY CRIT
[3]  
Bongartz G, 2000, EUR 16262
[4]   Estimating Effective Dose for CT Using Dose-Length Product Compared With Using Organ Doses: Consequences of Adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 103 or Dual-Energy Scanning [J].
Christner, Jodie A. ;
Kofler, James M. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (04) :881-889
[5]   COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY SCANNING WITH SIMULTANEOUS PATIENT TRANSLATION [J].
CRAWFORD, CR ;
KING, KF .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1990, 17 (06) :967-982
[6]  
ICRP, 2007, ANN ICRP, V103, P1
[7]  
International Commission on Radiological Protection, 1977, ICRP PUBLICATION
[8]   CONCEPT OF EFFECTIVE DOSE - PROPOSAL FOR COMBINATION OF ORGAN DOSES [J].
JACOBI, W .
RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS, 1975, 12 (02) :101-109
[9]   Dosimetry for optimisation of patient protection in computed tomography [J].
Jessen, KA ;
Shrimpton, PC ;
Geleijns, J ;
Panzer, W ;
Tosi, G .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 1999, 50 (01) :165-172
[10]  
Jessen KA, 2000, 16262 EUR