Optimal Operation of Virtual Charging Systems for Plug-In Electric Vehicles

被引:3
作者
Mokhtar, Mohamed [1 ]
Shaaban, Mostafa F. [2 ]
Zeineldin, Hatem [1 ,3 ]
El-Saadany, Ehab [3 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Engn, Elect Power & Machines Dept, Cairo 11517, Egypt
[2] Amer Univ Sharjah, Elect Engn Dept, Sharjah 26666, U Arab Emirates
[3] Khalifa Univ, Adv Power & Energy Ctr, Elect Engn & Comp Sci Dept, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
来源
IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL | 2022年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
Charging stations; Batteries; Vehicles; Costs; Games; Indexes; Customer satisfaction; electric vehicles (EVs); game theory; price competition; virtual charging system (VCS); PRICE;
D O I
10.1109/JSYST.2021.3134790
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This article proposes a novel concept, denoted as virtual charging system (VCS), for electric vehicles (EVs). In a conventional charging system (CCS) with a competitive environment, the competition between charging stations can utilize game theory as a price competition game model. On contrary, charging stations with different ownerships under the VCS umbrella will cooperate to act as one charging station for EV drivers in order to increase customer satisfaction and obtain more profits collectively and individually. The proposed VCS consists of three parts-participating charging stations, EVs contracting with the VCS, and finally the VCS operator. The operator is responsible for optimally routing the EVs to a suitable charging station within the VCS. A new formulation for implementing this novel concept is presented to allow interaction between various VCSs to maximize the profit gained by each VCS as well as minimize the transit charging time and cost for each customer as a measure representing customer satisfaction. Different case studies are introduced to evaluate the significance of the VCS concept. The performance of the VCS is compared to CCS, and the results show that VCS provides superior customer satisfaction and higher profit.
引用
收藏
页码:4619 / 4628
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Solving the Multivariant EV Routing Problem Incorporating V2G and G2V Options [J].
Abdulaal, Ahmed ;
Cintuglu, Mehmet H. ;
Asfour, Shihab ;
Mohammed, Osama A. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION, 2017, 3 (01) :238-248
[2]   The relative importance of price and driving range on electric vehicle adoption: Los Angeles case study [J].
Adepetu, Adedamola ;
Keshav, Srinivasan .
TRANSPORTATION, 2017, 44 (02) :353-373
[3]   Retail and Wholesale Electricity Pricing Considering Electric Vehicle Mobility [J].
Alizadeh, Mahnoosh ;
Wai, Hoi-To ;
Goldsmith, Andrea ;
Scaglione, Anna .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL OF NETWORK SYSTEMS, 2019, 6 (01) :249-260
[4]   Electric Vehicle Charging Navigation Strategy Considering Multiple Customer Concerns [J].
Alsabbagh, Amro ;
Li, Zhikang ;
Ma, Chengbin .
2021 4TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS, ICPS, 2021, :879-884
[5]   Optimal Operation of Interdependent Power Systems and Electrified Transportation Networks [J].
Amini, M. Hadi ;
Karabasoglu, Orkun .
ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (01)
[6]   Unsplittable Load Balancing in a Network of Charging Stations Under QoS Guarantees [J].
Bayram, Islam Safak ;
Michailidis, George ;
Devetsikiotis, Michael .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2015, 6 (03) :1292-1302
[7]  
Carmax, 2020, BEST ELECT CARS
[8]  
Carmax, 2020, 2020 BMW I3
[9]  
Chevrolet, 2020, CHEVROLET BOLT EV
[10]   An Event-Based Simulation Framework to Examine the Response of Power Grid to the Charging Demand of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles [J].
Darabi, Zahra ;
Ferdowsi, Mehdi .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 10 (01) :313-322