Amino acids as main substrates for sulfate-reducing bacteria in surface sediment of a eutrophic bay

被引:11
|
作者
Takii, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Metropolitan Univ, Grad Sch Sci, Dept Biol Sci, Tokyo 1920397, Japan
关键词
amino acids; sediment; seston; substrates; sulfate-reducing bacteria; Tokyo Bay;
D O I
10.2323/jgam.49.329
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The inner part of Tokyo Bay, Japan, is highly eutrophicated as shown by the frequent occurrence of red tide. The bottom water is anoxic during warm seasons especially at artificially dredged sites. In the sediment slurries prepared from surface sediment samples collected from the dredged sites, substrate addition stimulated the consumption of sulfate during anaerobic incubation. Of the substrates added, the seston composed mainly of diatom stimulated consumption more than lactate and acetate. Its effect was nearly equal to that of casamino acids. Casamino acids and some amino acids also accelerated the rate of sulfate reduction measured by the tracer method in sediment samples more than lactate or acetate. Anaerobic incubation of the sediment slurry amended with casamino acids showed that the consumption of amino acids was retarded by the addition of molybdate (final concentration; 20mm). In the slurry amended with only molybdate, glutamate was accumulated distinctively and linearly with time. Its accumulation rate in molar base was comparable to the rate of sulfate reduction. These results suggested that amino acids were the main substrates for sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) in the sediment. The MPN values of SRB in these sediment samples were often higher with the enumeration medium containing casamino acids instead of lactate. Furthermore, during a week incubation of sediment slurries amended with substrates, casamino acids and seston more greatly stimulated the growth,of SRB enumerated by both media than lactate.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 336
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dynamics of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Community Structure in Surface Sediment of a Seasonally Hypoxic Enclosed Bay
    Mori, Fumiaki
    Umezawa, Yu
    Kondo, Ryuji
    Wada, Minoru
    MICROBES AND ENVIRONMENTS, 2018, 33 (04) : 378 - 384
  • [2] Sulfate-reducing bacteria
    Hao, OJ
    Chen, JM
    Huang, L
    Buglass, RL
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 26 (02) : 155 - 187
  • [3] Effects of sulfate-reducing bacteria on methylmercury at the sediment–water interface
    Lingxia Zeng
    Guangjun Luo
    Tianrong He
    Yanna Guo
    Xiaoli Qian
    Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2016, (08) : 214 - 219
  • [4] Vertical distribution of major sulfate-reducing bacteria in a shallow eutrophic meromictic lake
    Kubo, Kyoko
    Kojima, Hisaya
    Fukui, Manabu
    SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 37 (07) : 510 - 519
  • [5] Nitrate reduction in sulfate-reducing bacteria
    Marietou, Angeliki
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 363 (15)
  • [6] Effects of sulfate-reducing bacteria on methylmercury at the sediment-water interface
    Zeng, Lingxia
    Luo, Guangjun
    He, Tianrong
    Guo, Yanna
    Qian, Xiaoli
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2016, 46 : 214 - 219
  • [7] Community structure and activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria in an intertidal surface sediment:: a multi-method approach
    Llobet-Brossa, E
    Rabus, R
    Böttcher, ME
    Könneke, M
    Finke, N
    Schramm, A
    Meyer, RL
    Grötzschel, S
    Rosselló-Mora, R
    Amann, R
    AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 2002, 29 (03) : 211 - 226
  • [8] Metabolic flexibility of sulfate-reducing bacteria
    Plugge, Caroline M.
    Zhang, Weiwen
    Scholten, Johannes C. M.
    Stams, Alfons J. M.
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 2
  • [9] Metabolism of sulfonic acids and other organosulfur compounds by sulfate-reducing bacteria
    Lie, TJ
    Leadbetter, JR
    Leadbetter, ER
    GEOMICROBIOLOGY JOURNAL, 1998, 15 (02) : 135 - 149
  • [10] Oxygen defense in sulfate-reducing bacteria
    Dolla, Alain
    Fournier, Marjorie
    Dermoun, Zorah
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 126 (01) : 87 - 100