Effectiveness of olanzapine monotherapy and olanzapine combination treatment in the long term following acute mania - Results of a two year observational study in bipolar disorder (EMBLEM)

被引:15
作者
Gonzalez-Pinto, Ana [1 ]
Vieta, Eduard [2 ]
Reed, Catherine [3 ]
Novick, Diego [3 ]
Barraco, Alessandra [4 ]
Aguado, Jaume [5 ]
Maria Haro, Josep [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, Hosp Santiago Apostol, Int Mood Disorders Res Ctr, Ctr Invest Biomed Red Salud Mental CIBERSAM, Vitoria, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Bipolar Disorders Program, IDIBAPS,CIBERSAM, E-08007 Barcelona, Spain
[3] Lilly Res Ctr, Windlesham, Surrey, England
[4] Eli Lilly Italia, Dept Med, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
[5] Fundacio St Joan Deu, CIBERSAM, St Joan De Deu SSM, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Bipolar disorder; Combination therapy; Maintenance therapy; Monotherapy; Olanzapine; Prospective observational study; I-DISORDER; PHARMACOLOGICAL-TREATMENT; RATING-SCALE; PATTERNS; THERAPY; RELIABILITY; POLYTHERAPY; VALIDITY; RELAPSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2010.11.037
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study compared the 2-year outcomes of patients with a manic/mixed episode of bipolar disorder taking olanzapine monotherapy or olanzapine in combination with other agents. Methods: EMBLEM (European Mania in Bipolar Longitudinal Evaluation of Medication) is a 2-year, prospective, observational study of clinical and functional outcomes of bipolar patients with an index manic/mixed episode. The study consisted of two phases: acute (12 weeks) and maintenance (follow-up over 2 years). The longitudinal outcome measure was the Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Disorder scale. Cox regression models compared outcomes of both therapy groups using intention-to-treat and switching medication analysis. Treatment-emergent adverse events were also assessed. Results: 1076 patients were included in this analysis. 29% took olanzapine as monotherapy (n = 313) and 71% as combination (n = 763) at 12-weeks post-baseline (end of study acute phase). After adjusting for patient characteristics using switching medication analysis, only relapse rates differed (p = 0.01) in favour of monotherapy-treated patients. There was no significant difference in rates of improvement, remission, and recovery. Patients treated with combination therapy reported more tremor (OR 237, 95%CI 1.44-3.89) and polyuria (OR 3.08, 95%CI 1.45-6.54) treatment-emergent events than monotherapy, although weight change was greater in the monotherapy group. Limitations: Unknown confounding and potential selection bias may differentially impact treatment outcomes. Conclusions: EMBLEM patients benefitted from the selected therapy to a similar extent. Differences in patient characteristics between those prescribed monotherapy and combination therapy appear to be clinically relevant in the treatment decision. Physicians must balance the benefits and risks when determining appropriate treatment for individual patients. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 329
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Psychotropic medications for patients with bipolar disorder in the United States: Polytherapy and adherence [J].
Baldessarini, Ross ;
Henk, Henry ;
Sklar, Ami ;
Chang, Jane ;
Leahy, Leslie .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2008, 59 (10) :1175-1183
[2]  
Beyer JL, 2008, PSYCHOPHARMACOL BULL, V41, P102
[3]   Multiple versus single antipsychotic agents for hospitalized psychiatric patients: Case-control study of risks versus benefits [J].
Centorrino, F ;
Goren, JL ;
Hennen, J ;
Salvatore, P ;
Kelleher, JP ;
Baldessarini, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 161 (04) :700-706
[4]   Rapid-cycling bipolar I disorder: Course and treatment outcome of a large sample across Europe [J].
Cruz, N. ;
Vieta, E. ;
Comes, M. ;
Haro, J. M. ;
Reed, C. ;
Bertsch, J. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2008, 42 (13) :1068-1075
[5]   Treatment of bipolar disorder: A complex treatment for a multi-faceted disorder [J].
Fountoulakis K.N. ;
Vieta E. ;
Siamouli M. ;
Valenti M. ;
Magiria S. ;
Oral T. ;
Fresno D. ;
Giannakopoulos P. ;
Kaprinis G.S. .
Annals of General Psychiatry, 6 (1)
[6]   Pharmacological treatment patterns at study entry for the first 500 STEP-BD participants [J].
Ghaemi, S. Nassir ;
Hsu, Douglas J. ;
Thase, Michael E. ;
Wisniewski, Stephen R. ;
Nierenberg, Andrew A. ;
Miyahara, Sachiko ;
Sachs, Gary .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2006, 57 (05) :660-665
[7]   Functional impairment in patients with mania: baseline results of the EMBLEM study [J].
Goetz, I. ;
Tohen, M. ;
Reed, C. ;
Lorenzo, M. ;
Vieta, E. .
BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2007, 9 (1-2) :45-52
[8]   Principal components of mania [J].
González-Pinto, A ;
Ballesteros, J ;
Aldama, A ;
de Heredia, JLP ;
Gutierrez, M ;
Mosquera, F ;
González-Pinto, A .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2003, 76 (1-3) :95-102
[9]   Validity and Reliability of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (5 Items) for Manic and Mixed Bipolar Disorders [J].
Gonzalez-Pinto, Ana ;
Mosquera, Fernando ;
Reed, Catherine ;
Novick, Diego ;
Barbeito, Sara ;
Vega, Patricia ;
Bertsch, Jordan ;
Alberich, Susana ;
Haro, Josep Maria .
JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 2009, 197 (09) :682-686
[10]   The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for the biological treatment of bipolar disorders, Part II:: Treatment of mania [J].
Grunze, H ;
Kasper, S ;
Goodwin, G ;
Bowden, C ;
Baldwin, D ;
Licht, RW ;
Vieta, E ;
Möller, HJ .
WORLD JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 4 (01) :5-13