Getting to the Point: Attempting to Improve Juror Comprehension of Capital Penalty Phase Instructions

被引:19
作者
Smith, Amy E. [2 ]
Haney, Craig [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[2] San Francisco State Univ, San Francisco, CA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Juror comprehension; Death penalty; Social psychology; Legal psychology language comprehension; Psycholinguistics; EXPERT PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTIMONY; DEATH MATTERS; RACIAL BIAS; DISCRETION; INFORM; LIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s10979-010-9246-0
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This research examined the effects of several versions of capital penalty phase instructions on juror comprehension. Study One documented the impact of California's recently implemented "plain language" instruction. It showed that although the new instruction has clear advantages over the previous version, significant comprehension problems remain. Study Two evaluated several modified instructions designed to enhance comprehension. Participants heard either a standard patterned instruction or one of two alternatives-a psycholinguistically improved instruction, or a "pinpoint" instruction using case-related facts to illustrate key terms-in a simulated death penalty sentencing phase. Persons who heard modified instructions demonstrated higher levels of comprehension on virtually every measure as compared to those in the standard instruction condition.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 350
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   CONCRETENESS-DEPENDENT ASSOCIATIVE PRIMING - SEPARATE LEXICAL ORGANIZATION FOR CONCRETE AND ABSTRACT WORDS [J].
BLEASDALE, FA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1987, 13 (04) :582-594
[2]  
Bransford JD., 1979, HUMAN COGNITION LEAR
[3]   EXPERT PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTIMONY IN RAPE TRIALS - A SOCIAL COGNITIVE ANALYSIS [J].
BREKKE, N ;
BORGIDA, E .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 55 (03) :372-386
[4]   MAKING LEGAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDABLE - PSYCHOLINGUISTIC STUDY OF JURY INSTRUCTIONS [J].
CHARROW, RP ;
CHARROW, VR .
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1979, 79 (07) :1306-1374
[5]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[6]  
DANN BM, 1993, INDIANA LAW J, V68, P1229
[7]  
*DEATH PEN INF CTR, 2007, DEATH ROW INM STAT
[8]  
Diamond SS, 1996, JUDICATURE, V79, P224
[9]  
Elwork A., 1982, MAKING JURY INSTRUCT
[10]   A ceiling or consistency effect for the comprehension of jury instructions [J].
English, PW ;
Sales, BD .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 1997, 3 (2-3) :381-401