Gender Differences in the Urology Residency Match-Does It Make a Difference?

被引:19
作者
Aisen, Carrie M.
Sui, Wilson
Pak, Jamie S.
Pagano, Matthew
Cooper, Kimberly L.
Badalato, Gina M.
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Urol Care Alliance, Old Bridge, NJ USA
关键词
APPLICANTS; SPECIALTY; SELECTION; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.061
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To assess the differences between the male and female urology resident applicant pool. Urology is a competitive field with a selective match process. Women have historically been a minority in medicine. Although this has equalized, women continue to be underrepresented in urology. MATERIALS AND METHODS All application submitted through the Electronic Residency Application Service to the Columbia University Department of Urology for the 2015 and 2016 match were reviewed. The differences between the cohorts of matched female and male urology applicants were assessed. RESULTS Two hundred fifty-six students in 2015 and 259 students in 2016 submitted applications to Columbia and completed rank lists (60% of the national cohort in 2015 and 62% in 2016). We did find that the overall male applicant pool had a slightly lower number of honors (3 vs 2, P = .02) and higher United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1 score (238 vs 234, P<.001). The only other statistically significant difference between the matched male and female cohorts was the average number of urology subinternships (1.4 [0.9] for men vs 1.18 [0.8] for women, P=.04). CONCLUSION Overall matched male and female applicants appeared to have very similar qualifications. Men had a higher USMLE step 1 score and women had a higher average number of honors. These data support the finding that contemporary male and female residency candidates who matched in urology had comparable achievements, and the criteria for residency selection in both cohorts are similar. (c) 2017 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 42
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
American Urological Association, 2015, UR RES MATCH STAT 20
[2]  
American Urological Association, 2016, UR RES MATCH STAT 20
[3]  
Baerlocher MO, 2005, CAN ASSOC RADIOL J, V56, P232
[4]   Female urologists: A growing population [J].
Bradbury, CL ;
King, DK ;
Middleton, RG .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (05) :1854-1856
[5]   Academic Differences Among Male and Female Candidates Applying for Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency: The Experience of One Program [J].
Brandt, Justin S. ;
Kramer, Sarah E. ;
Chosen, Stephen T. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 70 (04) :439-442
[6]   Factors Affecting Admission to Anesthesiology Residency in the United States Choosing the Future of Our Specialty [J].
de Oliveira, Gildasio S., Jr. ;
Akikwala, Tulsi ;
Kendall, Mark C. ;
Fitzgerald, Paul C. ;
Sullivan, John T. ;
Zell, Christopher ;
McCarthy, Robert J. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 117 (02) :243-251
[7]   Women in Urology Residency, 1978-2013: A Critical Look at Gender Representation in Our Specialty [J].
Halpern, Joshua A. ;
Lee, Una J. ;
Wolff, Erika M. ;
Mittal, Sameer ;
Shoag, Jonathan E. ;
Lightner, Deborah J. ;
Kim, Soo ;
Hu, Jim C. ;
Chughtai, Bilal ;
Lee, Richard K. .
UROLOGY, 2016, 92 :20-24
[8]   Gender Bias in Diagnostic Radiology Resident Selection, Does it Exist? [J].
Hewett, Lara ;
Lewis, Madelene ;
Collins, Heather ;
Gordon, Leonie .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (01) :101-107
[9]  
Jolliff L., 2011, WOMEN US ACAD MED SC
[10]   Prevalence of Research Publication Misrepresentation Among Urology Residency Applicants and Its Effect on Match Success [J].
Pak, Jamie S. ;
Pagano, Matthew J. ;
Cooper, Kimberly L. ;
McKiernan, James M. ;
Badalato, Gina M. .
UROLOGY, 2017, 99 :5-9