Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing implant sites augmented with a volume-stable collagen matrix or an autogenous connective tissue graft: 3-year data after insertion of reconstructions

被引:71
作者
Thoma, Daniel S. [1 ]
Gasser, Thomas J. W. [1 ]
Jung, Ronald E. [1 ]
Haemmerle, Christoph H. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Clin Reconstruct Dent, Ctr Dent Med, Plattenstr 11, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
collagen-based matrix; dental implant; soft tissue augmentation; soft tissue volume; subepithelial connective tissue graft; SOFT-TISSUE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; STABILITY; BONE; THICKNESS; SURVIVAL; EFFICACY; HEALTH; CROWNS; PART;
D O I
10.1111/jcpe.13271
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim To assess mid-term clinical, radiographic and profilometric outcomes at implant sites, previously grafted with a volume-stable collagen matrix (VCMX) or an autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG). Methods VCMX or SCTG were randomly applied to single implant sites in 20 patients. Following abutment connection and insertion of final reconstructions (baseline), patients were re-examined at 6 months (6M), at 1 year (FU-1) and at 3 years (FU-3). Measurements included the following: clinical data, radiographic measurement of first bone to implant contact (fBIC), soft tissue thickness and volumetric outcomes. Non-parametric tests and estimates were applied for the statistical analysis. Results The median buccal mucosal thickness increased by 0.5 mm (Q1: -0.5; Q3: 1.25) (VCMX) (p = .281) and by 0.8 mm (Q1: 0.0; Q3: 2.5) (SCTG) (p = .047) between BL and FU-3 (intergroup p = .303). The profilometric changes of the buccal soft tissues demonstrated a median decrease between BL and FU-3 of -0.2 mm (Q1: -0.5; Q3: -0.1) (p = .039) for VCMX and a decrease of -0.1 mm (Q1: -0.8; Q3: 0.1) (p = .020) for SCTG, respectively (intergroup p = .596). Peri-implant soft tissues and bone levels remained healthy throughout the entire study period. PROMs did not show any significant differences between the groups nor significant changes over time. Conclusion Minimal changes of the peri-implant tissue contour as well as of the soft tissue thickness were observed at implant sites previously grafted with VCMX or SCTG.
引用
收藏
页码:630 / 639
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   What is the effect of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone loss around dental implants? A systematic review [J].
Akcali, Aliye ;
Trullenque-Eriksson, Anna ;
Sun, Chuanming ;
Petrie, Aviva ;
Nibali, Luigi ;
Donos, Nikolaos .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (09) :1046-1053
[2]  
Bouri A, 2008, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V23, P323
[3]   Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for buccal soft tissue augmentation at implant site. A randomized, controlled clinical trial [J].
Cairo, Francesco ;
Barbato, Luigi ;
Tonelli, Paolo ;
Batalocco, Guido ;
Pagavino, Gabriella ;
Nieri, Michele .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2017, 44 (07) :769-776
[4]   Esthetic Outcomes Following Immediate and Early Implant Placement in the Anterior Maxilla-A Systematic Review [J].
Chen, Stephen T. ;
Buser, Daniel .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 :186-215
[5]   A randomized controlled study comparing guided bone regeneration with connective tissue graft to re-establish convexity at the buccal aspect of single implants: A one-year CBCT analysis [J].
De Bruyckere, Thomas ;
Eeckhout, Celien ;
Eghbali, Aryan ;
Younes, Faris ;
Vandekerckhove, Paulien ;
Cleymaet, Roberto ;
Cosyn, Jan .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2018, 45 (11) :1375-1387
[6]   Ultrasonic Assessment of Mucosal Thickness around Implants: Validity, Reproducibility, and Stability of Connective Tissue Grafts at the Buccal Aspect [J].
Eghbali, Aryan ;
De Bruyn, Hugo ;
Cosyn, Jan ;
Kerckaert, Ingrid ;
Tom Van Hoof .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (01) :51-61
[7]   Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation and buccal overbuilding: an animal study [J].
Fickl, Stefan ;
Schneider, David ;
Zuhr, Otto ;
Hinze, Marc ;
Ender, Andreas ;
Jung, Ronald E. ;
Huerzeler, Markus B. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2009, 36 (05) :442-448
[8]   Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns:: the pink esthetic score [J].
Fürhauser, R ;
Florescu, D ;
Benesch, T ;
Haas, R ;
Mailath, G ;
Watzek, G .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2005, 16 (06) :639-644
[9]   Evidence-based knowledge on the aesthetics and maintenance of peri-implant soft tissues: Osteology Foundation Consensus Report Part 1-Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on the maintenance of peri-implant soft tissue health [J].
Giannobile, William V. ;
Jung, Ronald E. ;
Schwarz, Frank .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 :7-10
[10]   The etiology of hard- and soft-tissue deficiencies at dental implants: A narrative review [J].
Hammerle, Christoph H. F. ;
Tarnow, Dennis .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2018, 89 :S291-S303