Trajectory of change of low anterior resection syndrome over time after restorative proctectomy for rectal adenocarcinoma

被引:15
作者
Al-Rashid, F. [1 ]
Robitaille, S. [2 ]
Liberman, A. S. [1 ,2 ]
Charlebois, P. [1 ,2 ]
Stein, B. [1 ,2 ]
Feldman, L. S. [2 ]
Fiore, J. F., Jr. [2 ]
Lee, L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ Hlth Ctr, Dept Surg, Colon & Rectal Surg, 1001 Blvd Decarie DS1-3310, Montreal, PQ H4A 3J1, Canada
[2] McGill Univ Hlth Ctr, Steinberg Bernstein Ctr Minimally Invas Surg & In, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Rectal cancer; Low anterior resection syndrome; Bowel dysfunction; Functional outcomes; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; BOWEL DYSFUNCTION; CANCER; SURGERY; PRESERVATION; POPULATION; ILEOSTOMY; CLOSURE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-021-02561-1
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer is associated with a high incidence of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), but few studies report longitudinal results for bowel function. The aim of our study was to examine the trajectory of change of LARS over the first 18 months after restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer. Methods A prospective database measuring functional outcomes in rectal cancer patients from a single university-affiliated specialist colorectal referral center from 10/2018 to 03/2020 was queried. Patients were included in this study if they underwent restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer and had at least three assessments in the first 18 months after primary surgery or after closure of proximal diversion. Bowel function was assessed using the LARS score, administered at every surveillance follow-up after restoration of bowel continuity. Latent-class growth curve (trajectory) analysis was used to identify different trajectories of LARS changes over the first 18 months and group patients into these trajectory groups. These groups were then compared to identify predictors for each trajectory. Results A total of 95 patients were included (63 males, mean age. 61.3 +/- 12.5 years). Trajectory analysis identified three distinct trajectory groups. Group 1 had stable minimal LARS over time (26%). Group 2 had early LARS scores consistent with the minor LARS category and improved with time (28%). Group 3 had persistently high LARS scores (45%). Neoadjuvant therapy, intersphincteric resection, and proximal diversion were more common in group 3. Conclusions We identified three main trajectories of change of LARS in the 18 months after restorative proctectomy. These data may be used to better inform patients of their expected postoperative bowel function.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 203
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes and quality of life after transanal or laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Alimova, I ;
Chernyshov, S. ;
Nagudov, M. ;
Rybakov, E. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2021, 25 (08) :901-913
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Hepatobiliary Cancers. Version 3.2020
[3]   Development and external validation of a nomogram and online tool to predict bowel dysfunction following restorative rectal cancer resection: the POLARS score [J].
Battersby, Nick J. ;
Bouliotis, George ;
Emmertsen, Katrine J. ;
Juul, Therese ;
Glynne-Jones, Rob ;
Branagan, Graham ;
Christensen, Peter ;
Laurberg, Soren ;
Moran, Brendan J. .
GUT, 2018, 67 (04) :688-696
[4]   Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer [J].
Brown, C. J. ;
Fenech, D. S. ;
McLeod, R. S. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (02)
[5]   Canadian taTME expert collaboration (CaTaCO) position statement [J].
Caycedo-Marulanda, Antonio ;
Brown, Carl J. ;
Chadi, Sami A. ;
Ashamalla, Shady ;
Lee, Lawrence ;
Stotland, Peter ;
Hameed, Usmaan ;
Melich, George ;
Ma, Grace ;
Letarte, Francois ;
Karimuddin, Ahmer ;
Quereshy, Fayez ;
Phang, Terry ;
Raval, Manoj ;
Vikis, Elena ;
Liberman, A. Sender ;
Bouchard, Alexandre ;
Bouchard, Phillipe ;
Drolet, Sebastien .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (09) :3748-3753
[6]   A Cross-Sectional Review of Reporting Variation in Postoperative Bowel Dysfunction After Rectal Cancer Surgery [J].
Chapman, Stephen J. ;
Bolton, William S. ;
Corrigan, Neil ;
Young, Neville ;
Jayne, David G. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (02) :240-247
[7]   Comparing functional outcomes between transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Choy, Kay T. ;
Yang, Tze Wei Wilson ;
Prabhakaran, Swetha ;
Heriot, Alexander ;
Kong, Joseph C. ;
Warrier, Satish K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 36 (06) :1163-1174
[8]   Treatment possibilities for low anterior resection syndrome: a review of the literature [J].
Dulskas, Audrius ;
Smolskas, Edgaras ;
Kildusiene, Inga ;
Samalavicius, Narimantas E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 33 (03) :251-260
[9]   Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer [J].
Emmertsen, K. J. ;
Laurberg, S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (10) :1377-1387
[10]   Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score Development and Validation of a Symptom-Based Scoring System for Bowel Dysfunction After Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer [J].
Emmertsen, Katrine J. ;
Laurberg, Soren .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 255 (05) :922-928