Assertion, action, and context

被引：0

作者：

McKenna, Robin ^{[1
]}

Hannon, Michael ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, England

[2] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham, England

来源：

SYNTHESE | 2021年 / 199卷 / 1-2期

关键词：

Epistemic norms; Assertion; Action; Contextualism; Relativism; KNOWLEDGE;

D O I：

10.1007/s11229-020-02705-0

中图分类号：

N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;

摘要：

A common objection to both contextualism and relativism about knowledge ascriptions is that they threaten knowledge norms of assertion and action. Consequently, if there is good reason to accept knowledge norms of assertion or action, there is good reason to reject both contextualism and relativism. In this paper we argue that neither contextualism nor relativism threaten knowledge norms of assertion or action.

引用

页码：731 / 743

页数：13

共 19 条

[11]

Hawthorne John., 2004, KNOWLEDGE LOTTERIES

[12] KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION [J].

Hawthorne, John ;

Stanley, Jason .

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2008, 105 (10) :571-590

[13] WHAT'S THE POINT OF "KNOWLEDGE" ANYWAY? [J].

Kelp, Christoph .

EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2011, 8 (01) :53-66

[14]

MacFarlane J., 2005, Oxford studies in epistemology, V1, P197, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780199285891.003.0008

[15] 'KNOWLEDGE' ASCRIPTIONS, SOCIAL ROLES AND SEMANTICS [J].

McKenna, Robin .

EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2013, 10 (04) :335-350

[16]

RYSIEW P., 2012, Knowledge Ascriptions, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199693702.003.0012

[17] Are all conversational implicatures cancellable? [J].

Weiner, M .

ANALYSIS, 2006, 66 (02) :127-130

[18]

Williamson Timothy, 2002, Knowledge and its limits

[19]

Worsnip Alex, 2017, ROUTLEDGE HDB EPISTE, P177

← 1 2 →