Use of bilateral prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with high risk of breast cancer

被引:17
|
作者
Valero, M. G. [1 ]
Moo, T-A [1 ]
Muhsen, S. [1 ]
Zabor, E. C. [2 ]
Stempel, M. [1 ]
Pusic, A. [3 ]
Gemignani, M. L. [1 ]
Morrow, M. [1 ]
Sacchini, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Breast Serv, Dept Surg, 300 East 66th St, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Biostat Serv, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Plast Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DUCT LOBULAR UNITS; BRCA2 MUTATION CARRIERS; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; AREOLA COMPLEX; ONCOLOGICAL SAFETY; RECONSTRUCTION; SATISFACTION; EXPERIENCE; REDUCTION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.11616
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is being performed increasingly for risk reduction in high-risk groups. There are limited data regarding complications and oncological outcomes in women undergoing bilateral prophylactic NSM. This study reviewed institutional experience with prophylactic NSM, and examined the indications, rates of postoperative complications, incidence of occult malignant disease and subsequent breast cancer diagnosis. Methods Women who had bilateral prophylactic NSM between 2000 and 2016 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Rates of postoperative complications, incidental breast cancer, recurrence and overall survival were evaluated. Results A total of 192 women underwent 384 prophylactic NSMs. Indications included BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations in 117 patients (60 center dot 9 per cent), family history of breast cancer in 35 (18 center dot 2 per cent), lobular carcinoma in situ in 29 (15 center dot 1 per cent) and other reasons in 11 (5 center dot 7 per cent). Immediate breast reconstruction was performed in 191 patients. Of 384 NSMs, 116 breasts (30 center dot 2 per cent) had some evidence of skin necrosis at follow-up, which resolved spontaneously in most; only 24 breasts (6 center dot 3 per cent) required debridement. Overall, there was at least one complication in 129 breasts (33 center dot 6 per cent); 3 center dot 6 and 1 center dot 6 per cent had incidental findings of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer respectively. The nipple-areola complex was preserved entirely in 378 mastectomies. After a median follow-up of 36 center dot 8 months, there had been no deaths and no new breast cancer diagnoses. Conclusion These findings support the use of prophylactic NSM in high-risk patients. The nipples could be preserved in the majority of patients, postoperative complication rates were low, and, with limited follow-up, there were no new breast cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1312
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Oncologic Safety of Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in a Population With BRCA Mutations A Multi-institutional Study
    Jakub, James W.
    Peled, Anne Warren
    Gray, Richard J.
    Greenup, Rachel A.
    Kiluk, John V.
    Sacchini, Virgilio
    McLaughlin, Sarah A.
    Tchou, Julia C.
    Vierkant, Robert A.
    Degnim, Amy C.
    Willey, Shawna
    JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (02) : 123 - 129
  • [42] Tumor-to-nipple Distance Should Not Preclude Nipple-sparing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients. Personal Experience and Literature Review
    Fregatti, Piero
    Gipponi, Marco
    Zoppoli, Gabriele
    Lambertini, Matteo
    Blondeaux, Eva
    Belgioia, Liliana
    Derosa, Raffaele
    Murelli, Federica
    Depaoli, Francesca
    Ceppi, Marcello
    Garlaschi, Alessandro
    Friedman, Daniele
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 40 (06) : 3543 - 3550
  • [43] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Colwell, Amy S.
    Christensen, Joani M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (05) : 44S - 50S
  • [44] Duoderm®-Bra for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Dayicioglu, Deniz
    Trotta, Rose
    Agoris, Corin
    Kumar, Ambuj
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 76 : S280 - S285
  • [45] Surgical Correction of Nipple Hypertrophy after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy with Breast Reconstruction
    Kawai, Kenichiro
    Fujiwara, Toshihiro
    Nishimoto, Soh
    Ishise, Hisako
    Saito, Takuya
    Nakajima, Koyo
    Kubo, Tateki
    Kakibuchi, Masao
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (07) : E5134
  • [46] Extended Indications for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Niemeyer, Markus
    Paepke, Stefan
    Schmid, Rainer
    Plattner, Birgit
    Mueller, Daniel
    Kiechle, Marion
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2011, 17 (03) : 296 - 299
  • [47] Staged breast reconstruction utilizing primary nipple repositioning surgery prior to nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Shih, Linden
    Doval, Andres
    Burns, Heather R.
    Kaplan, Jordan
    Ellsworth, Warren A.
    Chevray, Pierre M.
    Spiegel, Aldona J.
    Friedman, Jeffrey D.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2024, 91 : 249 - 257
  • [48] Free Nipple Grafting An Alternative for Patients Ineligible for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy?
    Doren, Erin Louise
    Kuykendall, Lauren Van Eldik
    Lopez, Jonathan Jeremiah
    Laronga, Christine
    Smith, Paul David
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2014, 72 (06) : S112 - S115
  • [49] How to accurately preoperative screen nipple-sparing mastectomy candidate-a nomogram for predicting nipple-areola complex involvement risk in breast cancer patients
    Xu, Yuanbing
    Pan, Dai
    Liu, Yi
    Liu, Hanzhong
    Sun, Xing
    Zhang, Wenjie
    Hu, Chaohua
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [50] A novel nipple-areola complex involvement predictive index for indicating nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients
    Seki, Hirohito
    Sakurai, Takashi
    Mizuno, Shodai
    Tokuda, Toshiki
    Kaburagi, Takuji
    Seki, Minako
    Karahashi, Tsuyoshi
    Nakajima, Kenichiro
    Shimizu, Ken
    Jinno, Hiromitsu
    BREAST CANCER, 2019, 26 (06) : 808 - 816