Use of bilateral prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with high risk of breast cancer

被引:17
|
作者
Valero, M. G. [1 ]
Moo, T-A [1 ]
Muhsen, S. [1 ]
Zabor, E. C. [2 ]
Stempel, M. [1 ]
Pusic, A. [3 ]
Gemignani, M. L. [1 ]
Morrow, M. [1 ]
Sacchini, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Breast Serv, Dept Surg, 300 East 66th St, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Biostat Serv, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Plast Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DUCT LOBULAR UNITS; BRCA2 MUTATION CARRIERS; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; AREOLA COMPLEX; ONCOLOGICAL SAFETY; RECONSTRUCTION; SATISFACTION; EXPERIENCE; REDUCTION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.11616
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is being performed increasingly for risk reduction in high-risk groups. There are limited data regarding complications and oncological outcomes in women undergoing bilateral prophylactic NSM. This study reviewed institutional experience with prophylactic NSM, and examined the indications, rates of postoperative complications, incidence of occult malignant disease and subsequent breast cancer diagnosis. Methods Women who had bilateral prophylactic NSM between 2000 and 2016 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Rates of postoperative complications, incidental breast cancer, recurrence and overall survival were evaluated. Results A total of 192 women underwent 384 prophylactic NSMs. Indications included BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations in 117 patients (60 center dot 9 per cent), family history of breast cancer in 35 (18 center dot 2 per cent), lobular carcinoma in situ in 29 (15 center dot 1 per cent) and other reasons in 11 (5 center dot 7 per cent). Immediate breast reconstruction was performed in 191 patients. Of 384 NSMs, 116 breasts (30 center dot 2 per cent) had some evidence of skin necrosis at follow-up, which resolved spontaneously in most; only 24 breasts (6 center dot 3 per cent) required debridement. Overall, there was at least one complication in 129 breasts (33 center dot 6 per cent); 3 center dot 6 and 1 center dot 6 per cent had incidental findings of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer respectively. The nipple-areola complex was preserved entirely in 378 mastectomies. After a median follow-up of 36 center dot 8 months, there had been no deaths and no new breast cancer diagnoses. Conclusion These findings support the use of prophylactic NSM in high-risk patients. The nipples could be preserved in the majority of patients, postoperative complication rates were low, and, with limited follow-up, there were no new breast cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1312
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Role of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature
    Mallon, Peter
    Feron, Jean-Guillaume
    Couturaud, Benoit
    Fitoussi, Alfred
    Lemasurier, Perig
    Guihard, Thierry
    Cothier-Savay, Isabelle
    Reyal, Fabien
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (05) : 969 - 984
  • [32] Salvage Nipple-sparing Mastectomy for Patients with Breast Cancer Recurrence: A Case Series of Brazilian Patients
    Frasson, Antonio Luiz
    Lichtenfels, Martina
    Barbosa, Fernanda
    Anton de Souza, Alessandra Borba
    Falcone, Ana Beatriz
    Miranda, Isabela
    Vollbrecht, Betina
    Malhone, Carolina
    Tariki, Jose Yoshikazu
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2022, 44 (05): : 489 - 496
  • [33] Nipple Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With Prior Breast Scars Is It Safe?
    Olson, Joshua
    Anderson, Layla Ann
    Ying, Jian
    Zhang, Min-Min
    Agarwal, Jayant P.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 78 (01) : 22 - 27
  • [34] Impact of Local Breast Cancer Recurrence on Reconstructed Breast in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction
    Wu, Zhen-Yu
    Han, Hyun Ho
    Han, Jing
    Kim, Hee Jeong
    Lee, Jongwon
    Chung, Il Yong
    Kim, Jisun
    Lee, Saebyeol
    Eom, Jin Sup
    Kim, Sung-Bae
    Gong, Gyungyub
    Kim, Hak Hee
    Son, Byung-Ho
    Ahn, Sei-Hyun
    Ko, BeomSeok
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (08) : 2535 - 2541
  • [35] Subcutaneous Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Shi, Aiping
    Wu, Di
    Li, Xingliang
    Zhang, Shifu
    Li, Sijie
    Xu, Hui
    Xie, Huijun
    Fan, Zhimin
    BREAST CARE, 2012, 7 (02) : 131 - 136
  • [36] Oncologic outcomes and radiation safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy with intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer
    Pan, Lingxiao
    Ye, Changsheng
    Chen, Lun
    Tang, Wei
    Zhang, Xiaoshen
    Gao, Jin
    Wu, Rui
    Ye, Xigang
    Tan, Weige
    Wan, Minghui
    Zheng, Wenbo
    BREAST CANCER, 2019, 26 (05) : 618 - 627
  • [37] Feasibility of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients with Tumor-Nipple Distance Less Than 2.0 cm
    Ryu, Jai Min
    Nam, Seok Jin
    Kim, Seok Won
    Lee, Se Kyung
    Bae, Soo Youn
    Yi, Ha Woo
    Park, Sungmin
    Paik, Hyun-June
    Lee, Jeong Eon
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (08) : 2028 - 2035
  • [38] Radiation Delivery in Patients Undergoing Therapeutic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Agarwal, Shailesh
    Agarwal, Jayant
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (01) : 46 - 51
  • [39] Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: Feasibility and safety study
    Toesca, Antonio
    Peradze, Nickolas
    Manconi, Andrea
    Galimberti, Viviana
    Intra, Mattia
    Colleoni, Marco
    Bonanni, Bernardo
    Curigliano, Giuseppe
    Rietjens, Mario
    Viale, Giuseppe
    Sacchini, Virgilio
    Veronesi, Paolo
    BREAST, 2017, 31 : 51 - 56
  • [40] Local recurrence following treatment for breast cancer with an endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Sakamoto, Naomi
    Fukuma, Eisuke
    Teraoka, Ko
    Hoshi, Kazuei
    BREAST CANCER, 2016, 23 (04) : 552 - 560