What common-garden experiments tell us about climate responses in plants

被引:29
|
作者
Schwinning, Susanne [1 ]
Lortie, Christopher J. [2 ]
Esque, Todd C. [3 ]
DeFalco, Lesley A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas State Univ, Dept Biol, San Marcos, TX 78666 USA
[2] York Univ, Dept Biol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] US Geol Survey, Western Ecol Res Ctr, Boulder City, NV USA
关键词
climate change; demographic models; fitness optima; local adaptation; meta-analysis; population x environment interaction; synthesis; FUNCTIONAL TRAITS; EVOLUTIONARY; COMMUNITIES; DESERT; LIFE; MAINTENANCE; COEXISTENCE; GERMINATION; ADAPTATION; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2745.13887
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
1. Common garden experiments are indoor or outdoor plantings of species or populations collected from multiple distinct geographic locations, grown together under shared conditions. These experiments examine a range of questions for theory and application using a variety of methods for analysis. The eight papers of this special feature comprise a cross section of contemporary approaches, summarized and synthesized here by what they tell us about the relationships between climate-related trait spectra and fitness optima. 2. Four of the eight papers are based on field experiments in prairie, desert, Mediterranean and boreal biomes. Representative of many common garden experiments, these experiments reveal consistent evidence of traits varying with population climate provenance, but evidence of a tradeoff between growth and tolerance traits or of consistent fitness optimization at home is scant, in contrast to trait theory. Two synthesis papers highlight dominant patterns of trait divergence, including for an exotic invasive species. One theoretical paper warned that unknown kinship relationships between populations can result in the misidentification of adaptive trait divergence. A third synthesis paper formulated novel and ambitious goals for common-garden studies through including measurement of response variables at multiple levels of biological organization. 3. The featured papers discuss multiple avenues for improving common garden studies. Genomic analysis, together with the quantification of kinship relationships, will continue to reveal the influence of environmental drivers on gene selection. Measuring a more complete set of fitness traits, especially for traits related to regeneration, will permit the development of projection models to explicitly link trait spectra, climate patterns and fitness consequences. More standardized data reporting will additionally improve abilities to synthesize findings across experiments. Testing population performance in competition with other species will produce more robust fitness comparisons between genotypes, especially for slower-growing genotypes in higher-resource environments. Adding gardens in and beyond climatic edge locations will furthermore strengthen the understanding of population failure and species exclusion. Finally, there is unrealized potential in adding ecosystem-level observations to common-garden studies that will enhance integrative analysis across scales of biological organization and scientific domains. 4. Synthesis. With novel, creative designs, data integration and synthesis, common garden experiments will continue to advance the understanding of trait ensembles interacting with climate across scales of biological organization, provide pivotal data for global change models and guide ecological applications such as restoration of habitats for rare and climate sensitive species.
引用
收藏
页码:986 / 996
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What social capital can tell us about social presence
    Oztok, Murat
    Zingaro, Daniel
    Makos, Alexandra
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 44 (06) : E203 - E206
  • [22] What is Learning Presence and What Can it Tell Us About Success in Learning Online?
    Wertz, Ruth E. H.
    2014 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2014,
  • [23] What Do Package Dependencies Tell Us About Semantic Versioning?
    Decan, Alexandre
    Mens, Tom
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2021, 47 (06) : 1226 - 1240
  • [24] What Does Epilepsy Tell Us About the Neural Correlates of Consciousness?
    Mann, Jake P.
    Cavanna, Andrea E.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2011, 23 (04) : 375 - 383
  • [25] What do sales data tell us about implant survival?
    Seemann, Rudolf
    Jirku, Alexander
    Wagner, Florian
    Wutzl, Arno
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02):
  • [26] G = E: What GWAS Can Tell Us about the Environment
    Gage, Suzanne H.
    Smith, George Davey
    Ware, Jennifer J.
    Flint, Jonathan
    Munafo, Marcus R.
    PLOS GENETICS, 2016, 12 (02):
  • [27] What do models tell us about water and sediment connectivity?
    Baartman, Jantiene E. M.
    Nunes, Joao Pedro
    Masselink, Rens
    Darboux, Frederic
    Bielders, Charles
    Degre, Aurore
    Cantreul, Vincent
    Cerdan, Olivier
    Grangeon, Thomas
    Fiener, Peter
    Wilken, Florian
    Schindewolf, Marcus
    Wainwright, John
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2020, 367
  • [28] What does the duration of belonging tell us about the temporal self?
    May, Vanessa
    TIME & SOCIETY, 2016, 25 (03) : 634 - 651
  • [29] What can kinematic studies tell us about the mechanisms of dystonia?
    Sadnicka, Anna
    Galea, Joseph
    Edwards, Mark J.
    MATHEMATICAL MODELLING IN MOTOR NEUROSCIENCE: STATE OF THE ART AND TRANSLATION TO THE CLINIC. GAZE ORIENTING MECHANISMS AND DISEASE, 2019, 249 : 251 - 260
  • [30] WHAT DOES AUTONOMIC AROUSAL TELL US ABOUT LOCOMOTOR LEARNING?
    Green, D. A.
    Bunday, K. L.
    Bowen, J.
    Carter, T.
    Bronstein, A. M.
    NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 170 (01) : 42 - 53