Prescribing antipsychotic medication for adults with intellectual disability: shared responsibilities between mental health services and primary care

被引:1
作者
Paton, Carol [1 ,2 ]
Roy, Ashok [3 ]
Purandare, Kiran [1 ,4 ]
Rendora, Olivia [2 ]
Barnes, Thomas R. E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, London, England
[2] Royal Coll Psychiatrists, London, England
[3] Coventry & Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[4] Cent & North West London NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
来源
BJPSYCH BULLETIN | 2022年 / 46卷 / 06期
关键词
Intellectual disability; antipsychotics; primary care; quality; mental health teams; PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1192/bjb.2021.72
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Aims and method We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health audit to assess the quality of requests from intellectual disability services to primary care for repeat prescriptions of antipsychotic medication. Results Forty-six National Health Service Trusts submitted treatment data on 977 adults with intellectual disability, receiving antipsychotic medication for more than a year, for whom prescribing responsibility had been transferred to primary care. Therapeutic effects had been monitored in the past 6 months in 80% of cases with a documented communication indicating which service was responsible for this and 72% of those with no such communication. The respective proportions were 69% and 42% for side-effect monitoring, and 79% and 30% for considering reducing/stopping antipsychotic medication. Clinical implications Where continuing antipsychotic medication is prescribed in primary care for people with intellectual disability, lack of guidance from secondary care regarding responsibilities for monitoring its effectiveness may be associated with inadequate review.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 315
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Role of the Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health
    Barnes, Thomas R. E.
    Paton, Carol
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 201 (06) : 428 - 429
  • [2] Prevalence of psychotropic medication use and association with challenging behaviour in adults with an intellectual disability. A total population study
    Bowring, D. L.
    Totsika, V.
    Hastings, R. P.
    Toogood, S.
    McMahon, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2017, 61 (06) : 604 - 617
  • [3] Care Quality Commission (CQC), 2020, OUT SIGHT WHO CAR RE
  • [4] Formic Solutions, 2020, FORM SOFTW FORM SOL
  • [5] Health Research Authority, 2017, Do I need NHS REC review? Decision tool
  • [6] Changes over a decade in psychotropic prescribing for people with intellectual disabilities: prospective cohort study
    Henderson, Angela
    Mcskimming, Paula
    Kinnear, Deborah
    McCowan, Colin
    McIntosh, Alasdair
    Allan, Linda
    Cooper, Sally-Ann
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [7] IBM Corporation, 2020, SPSS STAT VERSION 22
  • [8] Prevalence of psychotropic medication and factors associated with antipsychotic treatment in adults with intellectual disabilities: a cross-sectional, epidemiological study in Germany
    Koch, A. D.
    Dobrindt, J.
    Schuetzwohl, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2021, 65 (02) : 186 - 198
  • [9] Lester H., 2005, ADV PSYCHIAT TREAT, V11, P133, DOI DOI 10.1192/APT.11.2.133
  • [10] National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), 2015, Challenging behaviour and learning disabilities: prevention and interventions for people with learning disabilities whose behaviour challenges