Exploring the global and local social sustainability of wind energy technologies: An application of a social impact assessment framework

被引:34
作者
Buchmayr, A. [1 ,2 ]
Verhofstadt, E. [2 ]
Van Ootegem, L. [2 ]
Thomassen, G. [1 ,3 ]
Taelman, S. E. [1 ]
Dewulf, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Green Chem & Technol, Res Grp Sustainable Syst Engn, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Econ, Sint Pieterspl 6, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Univ Antwerp, Dept Engn Management, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Social impact; Social life cycle assessment; Renewable energy technologies; Sustainability; Wind energy; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; RENEWABLE ENERGY; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; ATTITUDES; IMPLEMENTATION; PERCEPTION; INDICATORS; GENERATION; SYSTEMS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118808
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
A transition to renewable energy sources is needed in the EU countries to achieve their goal of a low-carbon economy. This transition may come with potentially negative impacts on the well-being of the population, both globally and locally. Such social impacts are not yet systematically assessed for renewable energy technologies. In this paper, a social impact assessment framework for renewable energy technologies is developed and applied for a wind energy case study. The assessed social categories comprise impacts on human health, human rights infractions, working conditions, local job creation, quality of residential life, landscape quality. In order to cover this broad field of social impacts, four distinct social impact assessment methods were combined in a common social impact assessment framework. The application of the framework was demonstrated by means of the wind energy case study. The results are presented in the form of a social sustainability dashboard comprising 23 social impact indicators covering both global and local well-being impacts. The analysis showed that the life cycle material demand of offshore wind projects has larger impacts on global well-being than the onshore alternatives. For the local dimension, the offshore case was found to be less intrusive for the local population.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Sustainability assessment of energy systems: A novel integrated model [J].
Abu-Rayash, Azzam ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 212 :1098-1116
[2]  
Agency for Quality Assurance in Education and Training, 2014, REF FLEM QUAL FRAM E
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Employment Rate (Indicator), DOI [DOI 10.1787/1DE68A9B-EN, DOI 10.1787/7497563B-EN]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Complex surveys: a guide to analysis using R
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
[6]  
[Anonymous], Gross Domestic Product (gdp), DOI [DOI 10.1787/463DA4D1-EN, 10.1787/dc2f7aec-en, DOI 10.1787/DC2F7AEC-EN]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, NORD EN TECHN PERSP, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264257665-EN
[8]   Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies [J].
Assefa, G. ;
Frostell, B. .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2007, 29 (01) :63-78
[9]   Identifying Social Impacts in Product Supply Chains: Overview and Application of the Social Hotspot Database [J].
Benoit-Norris, Catherine ;
Cavan, Deana Aulisio ;
Norris, Gregory .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (09) :1946-1965
[10]   Public acceptance and preferences related to renewable energy and grid expansion policy: Empirical insights for Germany [J].
Bertsch, Valentin ;
Hall, Margeret ;
Weinhardt, Christof ;
Fichtner, Wolf .
ENERGY, 2016, 114 :465-477