Do aquatic macrophytes co-occur randomly? An analysis of null models in a tropical floodplain

被引:52
作者
Boschilia, Solana M. [1 ]
Oliveira, Edson F. [1 ]
Thomaz, Sidinei M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Maringa, BR-87020900 Maringa, Parana, Brazil
关键词
habitat segregation; competition; flood and drought disturbances; C-Score; checkerboard distribution;
D O I
10.1007/s00442-008-0983-4
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
One of the main issues in community ecology is the detection of structure and the identification of its related causes. In this study, co-occurrence null models were used to identify possible spatio-temporal patterns in the assemblage of aquatic macrophytes in the Upper Parana River floodplain. The samples were obtained through the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Program at two different grains: (1) a coarser spatial grain in January and August 2001 (entire floodplain lagoons); (2) and a finer spatial grain in November 2006 (1 m(2) quadrats). The study was conducted in 36 lagoons, both connected and disconnected to the main river channel, located in the sub-basins of the Baia, Ivinheima and Parana rivers. Two null models of species co-occurrence, the C-Score and Checkerboard indices, were used to test the null hypothesis of random structure of the aquatic macrophyte assemblages. The null models showed that the aquatic macrophyte assemblages were spatially structured in the distinct spatial grains. However, despite this general pattern, macrophyte assemblages are organized differently depending on the degree of connectivity, seasonal period and, at a finer grain, depth. Species co-occurrences were random in the disconnected lagoons during flood periods, in deep zones of the lagoons of the Baia River and in the shallow littoral zone in the lagoons of the Parana River. Analysis of the patterns of co-occurrence indicated that competition and/or habitat preferences are probably important influences on the nonrandom structure of assemblages. However, we suppose that at least three important factors (disturbances by water level fluctuation, dispersion and facilitation) counteract potential effects of competition in specific situations, leading macrophyte assemblages to assume random structure.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 214
页数:12
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] INTERRELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN EICHHORNIA-CRASSIPES (MART) SOLMS AND HYDROCOTYLE-UMBELLATA L
    AGAMI, M
    REDDY, KR
    [J]. AQUATIC BOTANY, 1991, 39 (1-2) : 147 - 157
  • [2] COMPETITION FOR SPACE BETWEEN EICHHORNIA-CRASSIPES (MART) SOLMS AND PISTIA-STRATIOTES L CULTURED IN NUTRIENT-ENRICHED WATER
    AGAMI, M
    REDDY, KR
    [J]. AQUATIC BOTANY, 1990, 38 (2-3) : 195 - 208
  • [3] Flood regime, dam regulation and fish in the Upper Parana River:: effects on assemblage attributes, reproduction and recruitment
    Agostinho, AA
    Gomes, LC
    Veríssimo, S
    Okada, EK
    [J]. REVIEWS IN FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES, 2004, 14 (01) : 11 - 19
  • [4] Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis
    Amarasekare, P
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2003, 6 (12) : 1109 - 1122
  • [5] Growth of Elodea canadensis and Elodea nuttallii in monocultures and mixture under different light and nutrient conditions
    Barrat-Segretain, MH
    [J]. ARCHIV FUR HYDROBIOLOGIE, 2004, 161 (01): : 133 - 144
  • [6] Strategies of reproduction, dispersion, and competition in river plants: A review
    BarratSegretain, MH
    [J]. VEGETATIO, 1996, 123 (01): : 13 - 37
  • [7] Bini LM, 2001, ARCH HYDROBIOL, V151, P511
  • [8] Ecological complexity of wetlands within a river landscape
    Bornette, G
    Amoros, C
    Piegay, H
    Tachet, J
    Hein, T
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1998, 85 (1-2) : 35 - 45
  • [9] Aquatic plant diversity in four river floodplains: a comparison at two hierarchical levels
    Bornette, G
    Piegay, H
    Citterio, A
    Amoros, C
    Godreau, V
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2001, 10 (10) : 1683 - 1701
  • [10] Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory
    Bruno, JF
    Stachowicz, JJ
    Bertness, MD
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2003, 18 (03) : 119 - 125