Persistent conduction abnormalities and requirements for pacemaking six months after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

被引:2
作者
Piazza, Nicolo
Nuis, Rutger-Jan
Tzikas, Apostolos
Otten, Amber
Onuma, Yoshinobu
Garcia, Hector Garcia
Schultz, Carl
van Domburg, Ron [1 ]
van Es, Gerrit-Anne [2 ]
van Geuns, Robert
de Jaegere, Peter
Serruys, Patrick W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thorax Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Cardialysis, Dept Biostat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
TAVI; conduction abnormalities; pacemaking; BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; REPLACEMENT; DISTURBANCES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: Early conduction abnormalities and need for pacemaking after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is well recognised. It is still unknown, however, if these conduction abnormalities are persistent, and what is the need for permanent pacemaking after 1-month follow-up. In this prospective study, we examined the incidence of post-procedural and 6-month conduction abnormalities and need for permanent pacemaking after TAVI. Methods and results: We examined the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) of 91 consecutive patients in whom a Medtronic CoreValve ReValving System was implanted between November 2005 and April 2009. We evaluated the ECGs before treatment, after treatment, at 1-month and 6-month follow-up. The requirement and timing of permanent pacemaking was documented. The mean age of patients was 81 +/- 7 years and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 16 +/- 9%. Median duration of follow-up was 213 days (IQR 64, 519). There was a 39% increase in the frequency of LBBB after TAVI (15% before treatment vs. 54% after treatment, p < 0.001). Importantly, there was no significant change in the frequency of LBBB from after treatment to 1- or 6-month follow-up (54% after treatment vs. 42% at 1-month follow-up, p=0.45, and 54% after treatment vs. 45% at 6-month follow-up, p=0.39). Permanent pacemaking was required in 17/91 (19%) of patients. A permanent pacemaker was implanted in 8/17 patients (47%) within seven days of TAVI, in 6/17 (35%) at 7-30 days, and in 3/17(18%) after 30 days. Male gender, previous myocardial infarction, pre-existing right bundle branch block, actual diameter (mm) of the inflow portion of the CoreValve frame post-implantation and depth of implantation were predictors for new LBBB; pre-treatment QRS duration (msec) and septal wall thickness were predictors for permanent pacemaking. Conclusions: These results suggest that early conduction abnormalities occurring after TAVI persist at 6-months follow-up. Patient-related, anatomical-related, and procedure-related factors need to be considered in the pathogenesis of conduction abnormalities after TAVI.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 484
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Bonow RO, 2008, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V52, pE1, DOI [10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.04.014, 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.007]
[2]   Early Conduction Disorders Following Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement [J].
Calvi, Valeria ;
Puzzangara, Euglena ;
Pruiti, Giusi Paola ;
Conti, Sergio ;
Di Grazia, Angelo ;
Ussia, Gian Paolo ;
Capodanno, Davide ;
Tamburino, Corrado .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 32 :S126-S130
[3]   Permanent pacemaker implantation after isolated aortic valve replacement: Incidence, indications, and predictors [J].
Dawkins, Sam ;
Hobson, Alex R. ;
Kalra, Paul R. ;
Tang, Augustine T. M. ;
Monro, James L. ;
Dawkins, Keith D. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 85 (01) :108-112
[4]  
de Jaegere Peter, 2007, EuroIntervention, V2, P500
[5]   SITES OF CONDUCTION DISEASE IN AORTIC-STENOSIS - SIGNIFICANCE OF VALVE GRADIENT AND CALCIFICATION [J].
DHINGRA, RC ;
AMATYLEON, F ;
PIETRAS, RJ ;
WYNDHAM, C ;
DEEDWANIA, PC ;
WU, D ;
DENES, P ;
ROSEN, KM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1977, 87 (03) :275-280
[6]   Prognostic significance of newly acquired bundle branch block after aortic valve replacement [J].
El-Khally, Z ;
Thibault, B ;
Staniloae, C ;
Theroux, P ;
Dubuc, M ;
Roy, D ;
Guerra, P ;
Macle, L ;
Talajic, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 94 (08) :1008-1011
[7]   Does the type of prosthesis influence the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation following isolated aortic valve replacement [J].
Elahi, MM ;
Osman, KA ;
Bhandari, M ;
Dhannapuneni, RRV .
HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2005, 8 (06) :E396-E400
[8]  
FRIEDMAN HS, 1978, BRIT HEART J, V40, P911
[9]   Progress and Current Status of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement: Results of Three Device Generations of the CoreValve Revalving System [J].
Grube, Eberhard ;
Buellesfeld, Lutz ;
Mueller, Ralf ;
Sauren, Barthel ;
Zickmann, Bernfried ;
Nair, Dinesh ;
Beucher, Harald ;
Felderhoff, Thomas ;
Iversen, Stein ;
Gerckens, Ulrich .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2008, 1 (03) :167-175
[10]   Electrocardiographic changes and clinical outcomes after transapical aortic valve implantation [J].
Gutierrez, Marcos ;
Rodes-Cabau, Josep ;
Bagur, Rodrigo ;
Doyle, Daniel ;
DeLarochelliere, Robert ;
Bergeron, Sebastien ;
Lemieux, Jerome ;
Villeneuve, Jacques ;
Cote, Melanie ;
Bertrand, Olivier F. ;
Poirier, Paul ;
Clavel, Marie-Annick ;
Pibarot, Philippe ;
Dumont, Eric .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 158 (02) :302-308