Contribution of Poland to Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to the Baltic Sea

被引:6
作者
Bartnicki, Jerzy [1 ]
Semeena, Valiyaveetil Shamsudheen [1 ]
Mazur, Andrzej [2 ]
Zwozdziak, Jerzy [3 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Meteorol Inst, POB 43 Blindern, NO-0313 Oslo, Norway
[2] Natl Res Inst, Inst Meteorol & Water Management, Ul Podlesna 61, PL-01673 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Gen Tadeusz Kosciuszko Mil Univ Land Forces MULF, Ul Czajkowskiego 109, PL-51147 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
Nitrogen emissions; Atmospheric transport; Nitrogen deposition; Baltic Sea; Air pollution model; VARIABILITY; PHOSPHORUS; IMPACT; INPUT; BASIN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11270-018-4009-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Poland is the second most important emission source after Germany in contributing atmospheric nitrogen deposition to the Baltic Sea basin. The main sectors contributing to reactive nitrogen emissions from Polish sources, in the period 1995-2014, are combustion and transportation, responsible together for over 97% of nitrogen oxide emissions, and agriculture responsible for over 98% of ammonia emissions. The EMEP MSC-W model with 50-km resolution was used for estimating the contribution of nitrogen emission sources from Poland to nitrogen deposition into the Baltic Sea basin and its sub-basins, in the period 1995-2014. Polish contribution in this period is mainly visible in annual wet deposition of reduced nitrogen with the range 13-18% and in wet deposition of oxidized nitrogen: 9-15%. Concerning sub-basins, a major contribution for Polish sources to total nitrogen deposition can be noticed for Baltic Proper with the range 13-19%, followed by northern sub-basins (7-18%) and finally by three western sub-basins (5-7%). Polish contribution to the Baltic Sea Basin in the year 2013 was analyzed in more detail using two models, the EMEP MSC-W model with 50-km resolution and model developed at the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management in Warsaw with 14-km resolution (IMWM Model). Both models give similar results concerning the deposition of oxidized nitrogen from Polish sources, but results show that the deposition of reduced nitrogen calculated with IMWM model is lower. The most likely reasons for the differences are different parameterizations of the deposition processes and chemical reactions in both models.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]  
Fagerli H., 2017, Transboundary particulate matter, photooxidants, acidifying and eutrophying components
[12]  
Gauss M., 2017, OZONE SUPPLEMENTARY
[13]  
Gauss M., 2017, ACIDIFYING EUTROPHYI
[14]  
Gauss M., 2015, MAT EMEP STATUS RE S
[15]   Projected change in atmospheric nitrogen deposition to the Baltic Sea towards 2020 [J].
Geels, C. ;
Hansen, K. M. ;
Christensen, J. H. ;
Skjoth, C. Ambelas ;
Ellermann, T. ;
Hedegaard, G. B. ;
Hertel, O. ;
Frohn, L. M. ;
Gross, A. ;
Brandt, J. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2012, 12 (05) :2615-2629
[16]   NITROGEN DEPOSITIONS TO THE BALTIC SEA - EXPERIMENTAL AND MODEL ESTIMATES [J].
HEIDAM, NZ .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1993, 27 (06) :815-822
[17]  
HELCOM, 1997, BALT SEA ENV P, V69
[18]  
HELCOM, 1993, BALT SEA ENV P, V45
[19]  
HELCOM, 1989, BALT SEA ENV P, V32
[20]   Operational mapping of atmospheric nitrogen deposition to the Baltic Sea [J].
Hertel, O ;
Skjoth, CA ;
Brandt, J ;
Christensen, JH ;
Frohn, LM ;
Frydendall, J .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2003, 3 :2083-2099