Evaluation of Learning Effectiveness After a Simulation-Based Training Pediatric Course for Emergency Physicians

被引:11
作者
Ansquer, Raihei [1 ,2 ]
Oriot, Denis [3 ,4 ]
Ghazali, Daniel Aiham [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Poitiers, Emergency Dept, Poitiers, France
[2] Univ Hosp Poitiers, Emergency Med Serv, Poitiers, France
[3] Univ Hosp Poitiers, Pediat Emergency Dept, Poitiers, France
[4] Univ Poitiers, Fac Med, ABS Lab, Simulat Lab, Poitiers, France
[5] Univ Hosp Bichat, Emergency Dept, 46 Rue Buchan, F-75018 Paris, France
[6] Univ Hosp Bichat, Emergency Med Serv, 46 Rue Buchan, F-75018 Paris, France
[7] Univ Paris Diderot, Simulat Ctr, Paris, France
关键词
education; simulation; EMS; university course; self-assessment; questionnaire; SELF-ASSESSMENT; EDUCATION; SKILLS; RESIDENTS; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1097/PEC.0000000000001961
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction For emergency physicians, pediatric emergencies represent rare and challenging situations. Simulation-based training (SBT) is increasingly used in medical education and recommended for implementation in the curriculum and postgraduate training. Objectives The objective of this study was to explore the self-assessment of emergency physicians' and residents' clinical practice in pediatric emergency care after SBT. Methods We surveyed emergency physicians and residents who successfully took a course of Pediatric Emergency Procedures (University of Poitiers, France) between 2010 and 2015. The course included didactics 50% of the time, and simulation the other 50%. According to Kirkpatrick model, 3 levels were approached: satisfaction, learning (knowledge, skills, and attitudes), and changes in clinical practice. The main results are expressed in numbers (percentages). Results One hundred percent of the 46 included emergency physicians and residents were satisfied with the course. Sixty-nine percent agreed with the realism of low-fidelity simulation, whereas 22% disagreed. Ninety-six percent agreed with high-fidelity simulator realism. One hundred percent of responders perceived a gain in knowledge, 98% in practical skill, and 83% in improved self-confidence. Among the clinical practice changes, 91% involved anticipation, 81% procedural skills, 92% algorithms, and 79% communication and teamwork. One hundred percent expressed the wish to repeat simulation sessions at a rate of 2 +/- 1 sessions per year. Conclusions Self-assessment of the Pediatric Emergency Procedures university course was very positive. According to the participants, this type of SBT on very specific pediatric emergency cares should be integrated to the emergency resident's curriculum. As regards pediatric emergency care, particularly dealing with low-volume, high-stake procedures, the participants were favorable to further, more regular simulation training.
引用
收藏
页码:E1186 / E1191
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Improving knowledge, technical skills, and confidence among pediatric health care providers in the management of chronic tracheostomy using a simulation model
    Agarwal, Amit
    Marks, Nancy
    Wessel, Valerie
    Willis, Denise
    Bai, Shasha
    Tang, Xinyu
    Ward, Wendy L.
    Schellhase, Dennis E.
    Carroll, John L.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2016, 51 (07) : 696 - 704
  • [2] Repetitive Pediatric Simulation Resuscitation Training
    Auerbach, Marc
    Kessler, David
    Foltin, Jessica Cooper
    [J]. PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2011, 27 (01) : 29 - 31
  • [3] Implementation and assessment of a training course for residents in neonatology and pediatric emergency medicine
    Brossier, D.
    Bellot, A.
    Villedieu, F.
    Fazilleau, L.
    Brouard, J.
    Guillois, B.
    [J]. ARCHIVES DE PEDIATRIE, 2017, 24 (05): : 432 - 438
  • [4] Technology-Enhanced Simulation and Pediatric Education: A Meta-analysis
    Cheng, Adam
    Lang, Tara R.
    Starr, Stephanie R.
    Pusic, Martin
    Cook, David A.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2014, 133 (05) : E1313 - E1323
  • [5] Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence - A systematic review
    Davis, David A.
    Mazmanian, Paul E.
    Fordis, Michael
    Van Harrison, R.
    Thorpe, Kevin E.
    Perrier, Laure
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 296 (09): : 1094 - 1102
  • [6] Can colonoscopy simulators enhance the learning curve for trainees?
    Gerson, Lauren B.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 64 (03) : 369 - 374
  • [7] Randomized controlled trial of multidisciplinary team stress and performance in immersive simulation for management of infant in shock: study protocol
    Ghazali, Daniel Aiham
    Ragot, Stephanie
    Breque, Cyril
    Guechi, Youcef
    Boureau-Voultoury, Amelie
    Petitpas, Franck
    Oriot, Denis
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 24
  • [8] The Past, Present, and Future of Simulation- based Education for Pediatric Emergency Medicine
    Grant, Vincent J.
    Wolff, Meg
    Adler, Mark
    [J]. CLINICAL PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (03) : 159 - 168
  • [9] Evaluation of the validity of medical students' self-assessments of proficiency in clinical simulations
    Isenberg, Gerald A.
    Roy, Vibin
    Veloski, Jon
    Berg, Katherine
    Yeo, Charles J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 193 (02) : 554 - 559
  • [10] Kirkpatrick D.L., 1967, TRAINING DEV HDB, P87