Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy - Is it an effective mode of treatment?

被引:30
作者
Srivastava, Aneesh [1 ]
Singh, Pratipal [1 ]
Gupta, Manu [1 ]
Ansari, M. S. [1 ]
Mandhani, Anil [1 ]
Kapoor, Rakesh [1 ]
Kumar, Anant [1 ]
Dubey, Deepak [1 ]
机构
[1] Sanjay Gandhi Postgrad Inst Med Sci, Dept Urol, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
laparoscopy; laparoscopic pyelolithotomy; laparoscopic pyeloplasty; pyelolithotomy and pyelolithotomy;
D O I
10.1159/000127347
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Pelviureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction and concomitant renal calculus disease may coexist. We present our experience with simultaneous laparoscopic pyeloplasty and pyelolithotomy in such patients. Method: 20 patients (20 renal units) underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty and concomitant pyelolithotomy at our institution. An initial dismembering of the PUJ followed by removal of the calculi with rigid or semi-rigid graspers were done. Calyceal stones were removed with the aid of a flexible cystoscope, rigid/flexible ureteroscope and simultaneous fluoroscopy. The pyeloplasty was subsequently performed in all cases. Result: A median of 2 stones (range 1-12) were recovered from the 20 renal units. Complete stone clearance was possible in 15/20 patients (75%). Three patients underwent subsequent extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and 2 required percutaneous nephrolithotomy. All patients were rendered stone-free at 6 months' follow-up. Diuretic renography at follow-up revealed improved drainage in 18/20 (90%) patients; 2 patients had an equivocal drainage pattern but their symptoms disappeared. Conclusion: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyeloplasty is feasible and effective, however patients must be counseled about the possibilities of ancillary procedures to achieve complete stone clearance. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 309
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Concomitant management of renal calculi and pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction with robotic laparoscopic surgery
    Atug, F
    Castle, EP
    Burgess, SV
    Thomas, R
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (09) : 1365 - 1368
  • [2] Ball Adam J, 2004, JSLS, V8, P223
  • [3] COMPARISON OF OPEN AND ENDOUROLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE OBSTRUCTED URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION
    BROOKS, JD
    KAVOUSSI, LR
    PREMINGER, GM
    SCHUESSLER, WW
    MOORE, RG
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1995, 46 (06) : 791 - 795
  • [4] Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Desai, MM
    Desai, MR
    Gill, NS
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [5] Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases
    Eden, CG
    Cahill, D
    Allen, JD
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 88 (06) : 526 - 531
  • [6] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status
    Inagaki, T
    Rha, KH
    Ong, AM
    Kavoussi, LR
    Jarrett, TW
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 : 102 - 105
  • [7] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases
    Jarrett, TW
    Chan, DY
    Charambura, TC
    Fugita, O
    Kavoussi, LR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (03) : 1253 - 1256
  • [8] Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: Longterm results from one institution
    Knudsen, BE
    Cook, AJ
    Watterson, JD
    Beiko, DT
    Nott, L
    Razvi, H
    Denstedt, JD
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2004, 63 (02) : 230 - 234
  • [9] Steps to reduce operative time in laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for moderate to large renal pelvis
    Mandhani, A
    Kumar, D
    Kumar, A
    Dubey, D
    Kapoor, R
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (05) : 981 - 984
  • [10] Safety profile and complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A critical analysis
    Mandhani, A
    Kumar, D
    Kumar, A
    Kapoor, R
    Dubey, D
    Srivastava, A
    Bhandari, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 (07) : 797 - 802