The influence of patient portals on users' decision making is insufficiently investigated: A systematic methodological review

被引:22
作者
Fraccaro, Paolo [1 ,2 ]
Vigo, Markel [3 ]
Balatsoukas, Panagiotis [4 ]
Buchan, Iain E. [5 ]
Peek, Niels [1 ,2 ,6 ]
van der Veer, Sabine N. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Farr Inst Hlth Informat Res, Hlth eRes Ctr, London, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Ctr Hlth Informat, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Sch Comp Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] City Univ London, Ctr Human Comp Interact Design, London, England
[5] Microsoft Healthcare, Cambridge, England
[6] NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translat R, Manchester, Lancs, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
User-computer interface [MeSH; Computers/utilisation [MeSH; Decision making [MeSH; Personal health record [MeSH; Patient access to records [MeSH; Patient portals; PERSONAL HEALTH RECORDS; MEDICAL-RECORDS; CLINICAL INFORMATION; PATIENTS ACCESS; OLDER-ADULTS; DIABETES-MELLITUS; DIGITAL DIVIDE; MEANINGFUL USE; ONLINE ACCESS; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.028
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Background: Patient portals are considered valuable conduits for supporting patients' self-management. However, it is unknown why they often fail to impact on health care processes and outcomes. This may be due to a scarcity of robust studies focusing on the steps that are required to induce improvement: users need to effectively interact with the portal (step 1) in order to receive information (step 2), which might influence their decision-making (step 3). We aimed to explore this potential knowledge gap by investigating to what extent each step has been investigated for patient portals, and explore the methodological approaches used. Methods: We performed a systematic literature review using Coiera's information value chain as a guiding theoretical framework. We searched MEDLINE and Scopus by combining terms related to patient portals and evaluation methodologies. Two reviewers selected relevant papers through duplicate screening, and one extracted data from the included papers. Results: We included 115 articles. The large majority (n=104) evaluated aspects related to interaction with patient portals (step 1). Usage was most often assessed (n=61), mainly by analysing system interaction data (n=50), with most authors considering participants as active users if they logged in at least once. Overall usability (n=57) was commonly assessed through non-validated questionnaires (n=44). Step 2 (information received) was investigated in 58 studies, primarily by analysing interaction data to evaluate usage of specific system functionalities (n=34). Eleven studies explicitly assessed the influence of patient portals on patients' and clinicians' decisions (step 3). Conclusions: Whereas interaction with patient portals has been extensively studied, their influence on users' decision-making remains under-investigated. Methodological approaches to evaluating usage and usability of portals showed room for improvement. To unlock the potential of patient portals, more (robust) research should focus on better understanding the complex process of how portals lead to improved health and care.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 111
页数:12
相关论文
共 155 条
[1]   A Comparison Of How Four Countries Use Health IT To Support Care For People With Chronic Conditions [J].
Adler-Milstein, Julia ;
Sarma, Nandini ;
Woskie, Liana R. ;
Jha, Ashish K. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2014, 33 (09) :1559-1566
[2]   The Impact of Electronic Patient Portals on Patient Care: A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials [J].
Ammenwerth, Elske ;
Schnell-Inderst, Petra ;
Hoerbst, Alexander .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (06) :325-337
[3]   Patient activation and use of an electronic patient portal [J].
Ancker, Jessica S. ;
Osorio, Snezana N. ;
Cheriff, Adam ;
Cole, Curtis L. ;
Silver, Michael ;
Kaushal, Rainu .
INFORMATICS FOR HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE, 2015, 40 (03) :254-266
[4]  
[Anonymous], GUIDE HLTH INFORM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, 9241 ISO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ELEVIER SCOPUS
[7]  
Bargas-Avila JA, 2011, 29TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, P2689
[8]   Exploring Three Perspectives on Feasibility of a Patient Portal for Older Adults [J].
Barron, Jeremy ;
Bedra, McKenzie ;
Wood, Jeffrey ;
Finkelstein, Joseph .
INTEGRATING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT FOR QUALITY OF CARE, 2014, 202 :181-184
[9]  
Barron JS, 2013, 2013 IEEE POINT-OF-CARE HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES (PHT), P232, DOI 10.1109/PHT.2013.6461327
[10]   Patient access to complex chronic disease records on the Internet [J].
Bartlett, Cherry ;
Simpson, Keith ;
Turner, A. Neil .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2012, 12