Group awareness and regulation in computer-supported collaborative learning

被引:19
作者
Schnaubert, Lenka [1 ]
Bodemer, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Lotharstr 65, D-47057 Duisburg, Germany
关键词
Group awareness; CSCL; Metacognitive regulation; Partner modelling; Working memory; SOCIALLY SHARED REGULATION; COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY; IMPRESSION-FORMATION; SITUATION AWARENESS; KNOWLEDGE AWARENESS; PERSPECTIVE-TAKING; SELF-REGULATION; OWN KNOWLEDGE; CSCL; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11412-022-09361-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Group awareness is of critical relevance for collaborative learning and interaction and is thus often referred to in CSCL research. However, the concept is only vaguely defined as some kind of understanding or perception of characteristics of learning partners or the collaborating group. Most CSCL research activities concerned with group awareness aim at modifying learners' awareness using so-called group awareness tools. However, there are much less attempts to measure group awareness and to conceptualize its formation. Thus, building on existing group awareness research, this article derives a conceptualization with six defining aspects of group awareness: (1) group awareness is cognitive, (2) group awareness is conscious, (3) group awareness is current, (4) group awareness is individual, (5) group awareness is social, and (6) group awareness is perceived as valid. Additionally, while it is often assumed that group awareness builds on self-regulatory skills, its role in regulating behavior and cognition within a social context is seldom explored. Thus, this article aims at defining and analyzing the concept of group awareness, specifying its relation to regulatory processes, and sketching possible research paths whilst building on, complementing, and informing tool-driven research.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 38
页数:28
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, European review of social psychology, DOI [10.1080/14792779108401859, DOI 10.1080/14792779108401859]
[2]  
Bannert M., 2006, Journal of Educational Computing Research, V35, P359, DOI 10.2190/94V6-R58H-3367-G388
[3]   Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes?: The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts [J].
Berthold, Kirsten ;
Nueckles, Matthias ;
Renkl, Alexander .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2007, 17 (05) :564-577
[4]  
Biswas G., 2018, Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, V2nd, P388, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315697048-25
[5]  
Bodemer D., 2014, P 22 INT C COMP ED I, P171
[6]  
Bodemer D, 2018, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, P351
[7]   Group awareness in CSCL environments [J].
Bodemer, Daniel ;
Dehler, Jessica .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 27 (03) :1043-1045
[8]   Tacit guidance for collaborative multimedia learning [J].
Bodemer, Daniel .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 27 (03) :1079-1086
[9]   Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning using dual-task methodology [J].
Brünken, R ;
Steinbacher, S ;
Plass, JL ;
Leutner, D .
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 49 (02) :109-119
[10]  
Buder J., 2021, INT HDB COMPUTER SUP, P295, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_16, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_16]