Radiation protection to patients in radiology: A review study

被引:7
作者
Jalilifar, M. [1 ]
Fatahi-Asl, J. [2 ]
Saba, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Aja Univ Med Sci, Fac Paramed, Radiol Dept, Tehran, Iran
[2] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Dept Radiol Technol, Ahvaz, Iran
关键词
shielding; radiation protection; radiology; AAPM/RSNA PHYSICS TUTORIAL; TUBE CURRENT MODULATION; DOSE REDUCTION; CORONARY-ANGIOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; THORACIC CT; BREAST; ORGAN; FLUOROSCOPY; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1051/radiopro/2021031
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The present paper aims at reviewing different shielding methods used for patients in medical imaging and investigating their merits and demerits. These techniques are generally classified into two groups including in-plane and out-of-plane shielding. Bismuth (Bi) shielding is a conventional in-plane shielding method used during CT examinations to protect radiosensitive organs. This method has reduced radiosensitive organs dose by about 34-68% during different CT examinations. However, it causes considerable degrading effects on image quality and for this reason AAPM recommended against its application in 2017. Recently, another in-plane shielding, named Saba shielding, introduced wherein all the shortcomings and deficits of Bi shielding have been resolved or fixed. Saba shielding reduces radiosensitive organs dose by about 50% without degrading image quality. Out-of-plane shields can decrease the patient dose by more than 55%. However, due to the low dose of the scattered radiation received by out-of-plane organs, in the case of applying out-of-plane shields such as gonad or thyroid shields, the risk and benefit of their usage should be evaluated.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 48
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] AAPM, 2017, PED ROUT ABD PELV CT
  • [2] AAPM, 2019, POLICY STATEMENT PP
  • [3] Assessment of breast absorbed doses during thoracic computed tomography scan to evaluate the effectiveness of bismuth shielding
    Alonso, Thessa C.
    Mourao, Arnaldo P.
    Santana, Priscila C.
    da Silva, Teogenes A.
    [J]. APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2016, 117 : 55 - 57
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, DOSE RISK EVALUATION
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, PAT DOS OPT FLUOR GU
  • [6] Blanc M, 1995, Radiol Med, V89, P319
  • [7] THYROID RADIATION DOSE TO PATIENTS FROM DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY PROCEDURES OVER EIGHT DECADES: 1930-2010
    Chang, Lienard A.
    Miller, Donald L.
    Lee, Choonsik
    Melo, Dunstana R.
    Villoing, Daphnee
    Drozdovitch, Vladimir
    Thierry-Chef, Isabelle
    Winters, Sarah J.
    Labrake, Michael
    Myers, Charles F.
    Lim, Hyeyeun
    Kitahara, Cari M.
    Linet, Martha S.
    Simon, Steven L.
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 2017, 113 (06): : 458 - 473
  • [8] Evaluation of the transmitted exposure through lead equivalent aprons used in a radiology department, including the contribution from backscatter
    Christodoulou, EG
    Goodsitt, MM
    Larson, SC
    Darner, KL
    Satti, J
    Chan, HP
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) : 1033 - 1038
  • [9] Radiation dose in dental radiology
    Cohnen, M
    Kemper, J
    Möbes, O
    Pawelzik, J
    Mödder, U
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (03) : 634 - 637
  • [10] Patient and operator dose during fluoroscopic examination of swallow mechanism
    Crawley, MT
    Savage, P
    Oakley, F
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2004, 77 (920) : 654 - 656