The Association Between Patient-Centered Communication and Primary Care Quality in Urban China: Evidence From a Standardized Patient Study

被引:9
作者
Su, Min [1 ]
Zhou, Zhongliang [2 ]
Si, Yafei [3 ,4 ]
Fan, Xiaojing [2 ]
机构
[1] Inner Mongolia Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Hohhot, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Adm, Xian, Peoples R China
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sch Risk & Actuarial Studies, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales, CEPAR, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
patient-centered communication; primary care; quality; standardized patient; China; PRIMARY-HEALTH-CARE; WORKPLACE VIOLENCE; CHART ABSTRACTION; DOCTOR; BARRIERS; OUTCOMES; WELL;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2021.779293
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundEffective patient-physician communication has been considered a central clinical function and core value of health system. Currently, there are no studies directly evaluating the association between patient-centered communication (PCC) and primary care quality in urban China. This study aims to investigate the association between PCC and primary care quality. MethodsThe standardized patients were used to measure PCC and the quality of health care. We recruited 12 standardized patients from local communities presenting fixed cases (unstable angina and asthma), including 492 interactions between physicians and standardized patients across 63 CHCs in Xi'an, China. PCC was scored on three dismissions: (1) exploring disease and illness experience, (2) understanding the whole person, and (3) finding common ground. We measured the quality of the primary care by (1) accuracy of diagnosis, (2) consultation time, (3) appropriateness of treatment, (4) unnecessary exams; (5) unnecessary drugs, and (6) medical expenditure. Ordinary least-squares regression models with fixed effects were used for the continuous variables and logistic regression models with fixed effects were used for the categorical variables. ResultsThe average score of PCC1, PCC2, and PCC3 was 12.24 +/- 4.04 (out of 64), 0.79 +/- 0.64 (out of 3), and 10.19 +/- 3.60 (out of 17), respectively. The total score of PCC was 23.22 +/- 6.24 (out of 84). We found 44.11% of the visits having a correct diagnosis, and 24.19% of the visits having correct treatment. The average number of unnecessary exams and drugs was 0.91 +/- 1.05, and 0.45 +/- 0.82, respectively. The average total cost was 35.00 +/- 41.26 CNY. After controlling for the potential confounding factors and fixed effects, the PCC increased the correct diagnosis by 10 percentage points (P < 0.01), the correct treatment by 7 percentage points (P < 0.01), the consultation time by 0.17 min (P < 0.01), the number of unnecessary drugs by 0.03 items (P < 0.01), and the medical expenditure by 1.46 CNY (P < 0.01). ConclusionsThis study revealed pretty poor communication between primary care providers and patients. The PCC model has not been achieved, which could be one source of the intensified physician-patient relationship. Our findings showed the PCC model in the primary care settings has positive associations with the quality of the primary care. Interactions with a higher score of PCC were more likely to have a correct diagnosis and correct treatment, more consultation time, more unnecessary drugs, and higher medical expenditure. To improve PCC, the clinical capacity and communication skills of primary care providers need to be strengthened. Also, strategies on reforming the pay structure to better reflect the value of physicians and providing a stronger motivation for performance improvement are urgently needed.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, LANCET, V383, P1013, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60501-8
  • [2] Ending violence against doctors in China
    不详
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 379 (9828) : 1764 - 1764
  • [3] Three global health-care quality reports in 2018
    Berwick, Donald M.
    Kelley, Edward
    Kruk, Margaret E.
    Nishtar, Sania
    Pate, Muhammad Ali
    [J]. LANCET, 2018, 392 (10143) : 194 - 195
  • [4] Self-Report Adherence Measures in Chronic Illness Retest Reliability and Predictive Validity
    Jerant, Anthony
    DiMatteo, Robin
    Arnsten, Julia
    Moore-Hill, Monique
    Franks, Peter
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2008, 46 (11) : 1134 - 1139
  • [5] Currie JM, 2020, ECONOMETRICA, V88, P847, DOI [10.3982/ECTA16591, 10.3982/ecta16591]
  • [6] Quality and Accountability in Health Care Delivery: Audit-Study Evidence from Primary Care in India
    Das, Jishnu
    Holla, Alaka
    Mohpal, Aakash
    Muralidharan, Karthik
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (12) : 3765 - 3799
  • [7] The impact of training informal health care providers in India: A randomized controlled trial
    Das, Jishnu
    Chowdhury, Abhijit
    Hussam, Reshmaan
    Banerjee, Abhijit V.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2016, 354 (6308)
  • [8] In Urban And Rural India, A Standardized Patient Study Showed Low Levels Of Provider Training And Huge Quality Gaps
    Das, Jishnu
    Holla, Alaka
    Das, Veena
    Mohanan, Manoj
    Tabak, Diana
    Chan, Brian
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2012, 31 (12) : 2774 - 2784
  • [9] A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness
    Doyle, Cathal
    Lennox, Laura
    Bell, Derek
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (01):
  • [10] Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: Theoretical and practical issues
    Epstein, RM
    Franks, P
    Fiscella, K
    Shields, CG
    Meldrum, SC
    Kravitz, RL
    Duberstein, PR
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 61 (07) : 1516 - 1528