Evaluation of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using the Ratio of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Measures

被引:3
|
作者
Onay, Aslihan [1 ]
Ertas, Gokhan [2 ]
Vural, Metin [3 ]
Acar, Omer [4 ]
Saglican, Yesim [5 ]
Coskun, Bilgen [3 ]
Akpek, Sergin [1 ]
机构
[1] Koc Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Yeditepe Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] VKF Amer Hosp, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Koc Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[5] Acibadem Univ, Dept Pathol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
3; T; GLEASON SCORE; COEFFICIENT; PATHOLOGY; BIOPSY; TUMOR; ADC; MRI;
D O I
10.1155/2017/5678350
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose. To evaluate the aggressiveness of peripheral zone prostate cancer by correlating the Gleason score (GS) with the ratio of the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures. Materials and Methods. Forty-two peripheral zone prostate tumors were imaged using DTI. Regions of interest focusing on the center of tumor foci and noncancerous tissue were used to extract statistical measures of mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotroy (FA). Measure ratio was calculated by dividing tumor measure by noncancerous tissue measure. Results. Strong correlations are observable between GS and MD measures while weak correlations are present between GS and FA measures. Minimum tumor MD (MDmin) and the ratio of minimum MD (rMD(min)) show the same highest correlation with GS (both rho = -0.73). Between GS <= 7 (3 + 4) and GS >= 7 (4 + 3), differences are significant for all MD measures but for some FA measures. MD measures perform better than FA measures in discriminating GS >= 7 (4 + 3). Conclusion. Ratios of MD measures can be used in evaluation of peripheral zone prostate cancer aggressiveness; however tumor MD measures alone perform similarly.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diffusion tensor imaging: survival analysis prediction in breast cancer patients
    Urut, Devrim Ulas
    Karabulut, Derya
    Hereklioglu, Savas
    Ozdemir, Gulsah
    Cicin, Berkin Anil
    Hacioglu, Bekir
    Sut, Necet
    Tuncbilek, Nermin
    RADIOLOGIE, 2024, 64 (SUPPL 1): : 54 - 59
  • [42] Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: should we use quantitative metrics to better characterize focal lesions originating in the peripheral zone?
    Pierre, Thibaut
    Cornud, Francois
    Colleter, Loic
    Beuvon, Frederic
    Foissac, Frantz
    Delongchamps, Nicolas B.
    Legmann, Paul
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (05) : 2236 - 2245
  • [43] Clinical utility of the normalized apparent diffusion coefficient for preoperative evaluation of the aggressiveness of prostate cancer
    Ryo Itatani
    Tomohiro Namimoto
    Akira Yoshimura
    Kazuhiro Katahira
    Seiichiro Noda
    Nobuyuki Toyonari
    Kosuke Kitani
    Yasuyuki Hamada
    Mitsuhiko Kitaoka
    Yasuyuki Yamashita
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2014, 32 : 685 - 691
  • [44] Prospective evaluation of lateral biopsies of the peripheral zone for prostate cancer detection
    Chang, JJ
    Shinohara, K
    Bhargava, V
    Presti, JC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (06) : 2111 - 2114
  • [45] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy
    Iannelli, Giancarlo
    Caivano, Rocchina
    Rago, Luciana
    Simeon, Vittorio
    Lotumolo, Antonella
    Rabasco, Paola
    Villonio, Antonio
    Gioioso, Matilde
    Mastrangelo, Pietro
    Barchetti, Flavio
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Macarini, Luca
    Guglielmi, Giuseppe
    Cammarota, Aldo
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2016, 102 (01): : 71 - 76
  • [46] Diagnostic evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer: Detection in a biopsy population
    Ding, Kai
    Yao, Yong
    Gao, Yun
    Lu, Xudong
    Chen, Hongwei
    Tang, Qunfeng
    Hua, Chenchen
    Zhou, Ming
    Zun, Xinnong
    Yin, Qihua
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 118 : 138 - 146
  • [47] Evaluation of neuregulin-1′s neuroprotection against ischemic injury in rats using diffusion tensor imaging
    Wang, Silun
    Li, Yonggang
    Paudyal, Ramesh
    Ford, Byron D.
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 53 : 63 - 70
  • [48] Peripheral nerve diffusion tensor imaging is reliable and reproducible
    Simon, Neil G.
    Lagopoulos, Jim
    Gallagher, Thomas
    Kliot, Michel
    Kiernan, Matthew C.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 43 (04) : 962 - 969
  • [49] Diffusion tensor imaging of the normal prostate at 3 Tesla
    Gurses, Bengi
    Kabakci, Neslihan
    Kovanlikaya, Arzu
    Firat, Zeynep
    Bayram, Ali
    Ulug, Aziz Muefit
    Kovanlikaya, Ilhami
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (04) : 716 - 721
  • [50] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for peripheral zone prostate cancer: the influence of the b-value combination on the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient
    Rezaeian, Abbas
    Ostovari, Mohsen
    Hoseini-Ghahfarokhi, Mojtab
    Khanbabae, Hashem
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 87 : E215 - E219