Evaluation of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using the Ratio of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Measures

被引:3
|
作者
Onay, Aslihan [1 ]
Ertas, Gokhan [2 ]
Vural, Metin [3 ]
Acar, Omer [4 ]
Saglican, Yesim [5 ]
Coskun, Bilgen [3 ]
Akpek, Sergin [1 ]
机构
[1] Koc Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Yeditepe Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] VKF Amer Hosp, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Koc Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[5] Acibadem Univ, Dept Pathol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
3; T; GLEASON SCORE; COEFFICIENT; PATHOLOGY; BIOPSY; TUMOR; ADC; MRI;
D O I
10.1155/2017/5678350
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose. To evaluate the aggressiveness of peripheral zone prostate cancer by correlating the Gleason score (GS) with the ratio of the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures. Materials and Methods. Forty-two peripheral zone prostate tumors were imaged using DTI. Regions of interest focusing on the center of tumor foci and noncancerous tissue were used to extract statistical measures of mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotroy (FA). Measure ratio was calculated by dividing tumor measure by noncancerous tissue measure. Results. Strong correlations are observable between GS and MD measures while weak correlations are present between GS and FA measures. Minimum tumor MD (MDmin) and the ratio of minimum MD (rMD(min)) show the same highest correlation with GS (both rho = -0.73). Between GS <= 7 (3 + 4) and GS >= 7 (4 + 3), differences are significant for all MD measures but for some FA measures. MD measures perform better than FA measures in discriminating GS >= 7 (4 + 3). Conclusion. Ratios of MD measures can be used in evaluation of peripheral zone prostate cancer aggressiveness; however tumor MD measures alone perform similarly.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correlation of gleason scores with magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer
    Li, Liang
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Deng, Ming
    Cai, Jie
    Yuan, Ling
    Feng, Zhaoyan
    Min, Xiangde
    Hu, Zhiquan
    Hu, Daoyu
    Liu, Jihong
    Wang, Liang
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (02) : 460 - 467
  • [2] Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer
    Roethke, Matthias C.
    Kuder, Tristan A.
    Kuru, Timur H.
    Fenchel, Michael
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    Laun, Frederik B.
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Stieltjes, Bram
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2015, 50 (08) : 483 - 489
  • [3] Evaluation of the normal-to-diseased apparent diffusion coefficient ratio as an indicator of prostate cancer aggressiveness
    Lebovici, Andrei
    Sfrangeu, Silviu A.
    Feier, Diana
    Caraiani, Cosmin
    Lucan, Ciprian
    Suciu, Mihai
    Elec, Florin
    Iacob, Gheorghita
    Buruian, Mircea
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2014, 14
  • [4] Predicting the aggressiveness of peripheral zone prostate cancer using a fractional order calculus diffusion model
    Li, Zhihua
    Dan, Guangyu
    Tammana, Vikram
    Johnson, Scott
    Zhong, Zheng
    Rabiee, Behnam
    Zhou, Xiaohong Joe
    Xie, Karen L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 143
  • [5] Interpatient Variation in Normal Peripheral Zone Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Effect on the Prediction of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness
    Litjens, Geert J. S.
    Hambrock, Thomas
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Huisman, Henkjan J.
    RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (01) : 260 - 266
  • [6] Characterization of prostate cancer using diffusion tensor imaging: A new perspective
    Gholizadeh, Neda
    Greer, Peter B.
    Simpson, John
    Denham, Jim
    Lau, Peter
    Dowling, Jason
    Hondermarck, Hubert
    Ramadan, Saadallah
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 110 : 112 - 120
  • [7] Diffusion Is Directional: Innovative Diffusion Tensor Imaging to Improve Prostate Cancer Detection
    Shenhar, Chen
    Degani, Hadassa
    Ber, Yaara
    Baniel, Jack
    Tamir, Shlomit
    Benjaminov, Ofer
    Rosen, Philip
    Furman-Haran, Edna
    Margel, David
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (03)
  • [8] Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging for prostate cancer: Peripheral zone versus transition zone
    Lee, Hakmin
    Hwang, Sung Il
    Lee, Hak Jong
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Lee, Sang Eun
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [9] T2*relaxation time in the detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer in comparison with diffusion-weighted imaging
    Wu, L-M.
    Zhou, B.
    Lu, Q.
    Suo, S-T.
    Liu, Q.
    Hu, J.
    Haccke, E. M.
    Chen, X-X.
    Xu, J-R.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 71 (04) : 356 - 362
  • [10] Correlation of diffusion tensor imaging parameters and Gleason scores of prostate cancer
    Tian, Weizhong
    Zhang, Ji
    Tian, Fangzheng
    Shen, Junkang
    Niu, Tianli
    He, Guohua
    Yu, Hong
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2018, 15 (01) : 351 - 356