Agronomic Growth Performance of Super Rice under Water-Saving Irrigation Methods with Different Water-Controlled Thresholds in Different Growth Stages

被引:15
作者
Zheng, Chengxin [1 ]
Zhang, Zhanyu [2 ]
Hao, Shurong [2 ]
Chen, Wenmeng [3 ]
Pan, Yongchun [2 ]
Wang, Zixin [2 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Water Conservancy & Hydropower Engn, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Coll Agr Engn, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Hydraul Res Inst, Nanjing 210017, Peoples R China
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
rice; agronomic growth; control thresholds; water-saving irrigation; yield; ORYZA-SATIVA L; LOWLAND RICE; USE EFFICIENCY; GRAIN-YIELD; PRODUCTIVITY; MANAGEMENT; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; RESPONSES; VARIETY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy10020239
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Many water-saving techniques have been developed for rice production in response to irrigation water scarcity. The selection of the water-saving methods and the optimum thresholds for obtaining maximum benefits of these regimes are largely site-specific depending mainly on soil type, soil texture, and the environment. A two-year (2017 and 2018) experiment was conducted to evaluate the response of the agronomic growth performance, yield, and water use of super rice varieties under different irrigation regimes in Jiangsu Province, China. The irrigation regimes were comprised of different water-controlled thresholds, in different growth stages. Treatments included traditional flooding irrigation (FI, as the control) and the following four water-saving irrigation (WSI) regimes: shallow adjusting irrigation (WSI1), rainwater-catching and controlled irrigation (WSI2), controlled irrigation (WSI3), and drought planting with straw mulching (WSI4). The results showed that WSI treatments significantly increased the irrigation water use efficiency by 20.60% to 56.92% as compared with FI. The WSI treatments significantly decreased the crop evapotranspiration during the rice growth period. The grain yields of WSI1, WSI2, and WSI3 were significantly increased (6.62%-7.20% for WSI1, 8.21%-12.39% for WSI2, and 8.30%-12.91% for WSI3) as compared with that of the control, whereas WSI4 decreased the rice yield by 11.69%-18.10%. This research implies that WSI2 and WSI3 have the greatest potential for promotion in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River. An optimization of the irrigation threshold of WSI1 and WSI4 should be considered to guarantee the overall benefit.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Comparisons of energy balance and evapotranspiration between flooded and aerobic rice fields in the Philippines [J].
Alberto, Ma Carmelita R. ;
Wassmann, Reiner ;
Hirano, Takashi ;
Miyata, Akira ;
Hatano, Ryusuke ;
Kumar, Arvind ;
Padre, Agnes ;
Amante, Modesto .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2011, 98 (09) :1417-1430
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, AGRICULTURE BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/AGRICULTURE9100212
[3]   Irrigation methods affect water productivity, grain yield, and growth responses of rice at different levels of nitrogen [J].
Aziz, O. ;
Bin, L. ;
Imtiaz, M. ;
Chen, J. ;
He, Y. ;
Lin, L. ;
Ali, S. ;
Riaz, M. ;
Mehmood, S. ;
Rizwan, M. ;
Lu, G. .
JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2018, 73 (03) :329-336
[4]   Effect of fertilization on crop responses and solute transport for rice crop in a sub-humid and sub-tropical region [J].
Behera, S. K. ;
Panda, R. K. .
PADDY AND WATER ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 11 (1-4) :227-239
[5]   Effect of water-saving irrigation on rice yield and water use in typical lowland conditions in Asia [J].
Belder, P ;
Bouman, BAM ;
Cabangon, R ;
Lu, G ;
Quilang, EJP ;
Li, YH ;
Spiertz, JHJ ;
Tuong, TP .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2004, 65 (03) :193-210
[6]   A conceptual framework for the improvement of crop water productivity at different spatial scales [J].
Bouman, B. A. M. .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2007, 93 (1-3) :43-60
[7]   Field water management to save water and increase its productivity in irrigated lowland rice [J].
Bouman, BAM ;
Tuong, TP .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2001, 49 (01) :11-30
[8]   Water productivity, energy and economic analysis of transplanting methods with different irrigation regimes in Basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.) under north-western India [J].
Brar, A. S. ;
Buttar, G. S. ;
Jhanji, Daman ;
Sharma, Neerja ;
Vashist, K. K. ;
Mahal, S. S. ;
Deol, J. S. ;
Singh, Gagandeep .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2015, 158 :189-195
[9]   Effect of irrigation method and N-fertilizer management on rice yield, water productivity and nutrient-use efficiencies in typical lowland rice conditions in China [J].
Cabangon, Romeo J. ;
To Phuc Tuong ;
Castillo, Ernesto G. ;
Bao, Lang Xing ;
Lu, Guoan ;
Wang, Guangho ;
Cui, Yuanlai ;
Bouman, Bas A. M. ;
Li, Yuanhua ;
Chen, Chongde ;
Wang, Jianzhang .
PADDY AND WATER ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 2 (04) :195-206
[10]   Effects of watering regime and nitrogen application rate on the photosynthetic parameters, physiological characteristics, and agronomic traits of rice [J].
Cao, Xiaochuang ;
Zhong, Chu ;
Sajid, Hussain ;
Zhu, Lianfeng ;
Zhang, Junhua ;
Wu, Lianghuan ;
Jin, Qianyu .
ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM, 2017, 39 (06)