Normal pressure values and repeatability of the Emed® ST2 system

被引:35
作者
Maetzler, M. [1 ]
Bochdansky, T. [2 ]
Abboud, R. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, IMAR, TORT Ctr, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
[2] LKH Rankweil, A-6830 Rankweil, Austria
关键词
Normal; Barefoot; Pressure; Emed (R) ST2; Repeatability; MIDGAIT METHODS; PLANTAR; 2-STEP; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.06.023
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study was designed to assess the repeatability of the Emed (R) ST2 system and identify the range of pressure values observed in the normal foot. Methods: Measurements were taken from twenty-three healthy subjects, 14 females and 9 males, on two occasions 7 days apart. Begin of contact (BC), end of contact (EC), contact time (CT). peak pressure (PP), instant of peak pressure (IPP), contact area (CA) and pressure time integral (PTI) were recorded. Results: The coefficient of repeatability (CR) was less than 16.0% for all 63 parameters considered. In 87.3% of the parameters investigated (55 of 63) the CR (expressed as a percentage of the mean) was less than 10%. The highest areas of PP were found under the great toe and second metatarsal heads, with mean (S.D.) equal to 435 kPa (202) and 407 kPa (146), respectively, followed by the third metatarsal head 345 kPa (96) and the hindfoot 332 kPa (93). The CT (% ROP (range of pressure)) was in the range 74-85% under the metatarsal heads, and 71% under the great toe. CA was highest under the heel at 33.8 cm(2). Conclusion: Emed (R) ST2 system was found to be repeatable. The presented range of parameters compared very well to the results presented in the literature for the Emed (R) ST4 system. (C) 2010 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 394
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] ABBOUD RJ, 1996, SURG DISORDERS FOOT, P123
  • [2] Akhlaghi F., 1994, The foot, V4, P62, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0958-2592(94)90031-0, 10.1016/0958-2592(94)90031-0]
  • [3] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [4] Comparison of the reliability of plantar pressure measurements using the two-step and midgait methods of data collection
    Bryant, A
    Singer, K
    Tinley, P
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 20 (10) : 646 - 650
  • [5] Normal values of plantar pressure measurements determined using the EMED-SF system
    Bryant, AR
    Tinley, P
    Singer, KP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 90 (06): : 295 - 299
  • [6] Femery V., 2002, Annales de Readaptation et de Medecine Physique, V45, P114, DOI 10.1016/S0168-6054(02)00186-1
  • [7] Between-day reliability of repeated plantar pressure distribution measurements in a normal population
    Gurney, Jason K.
    Kersting, Uwe G.
    Rosenbaum, Dieter
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2008, 27 (04) : 706 - 709
  • [8] Hayes A, 1997, Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), V12, pS3, DOI 10.1016/S0268-0033(97)88309-X
  • [9] Hughes J, 1993, Foot Ankle, V14, P514
  • [10] Variability of plantar pressure data -: A comparison of the two-step and midgait methods
    McPoil, TG
    Cornwall, MW
    Dupuis, L
    Cornwell, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 89 (10): : 495 - 501