MRI Screening and MRI/US Fusion-Guided Transperineal Biopsy in Detecting Prostate Cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Yin, Hongqing [1 ]
Shao, Jun [1 ]
Song, Huan [2 ]
Ding, Wei [1 ]
Xu, Bin [1 ]
Cao, Hui [1 ]
Wang, Jianming [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ, Dept Ultrasound, Kunshan Hosp, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Ctr Global Hlth, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasound; systematic biopsy; transperineal biopsy; prostate cancer; screening; TARGETED BIOPSY; ULTRASOUND; MEN; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1177/15330338211019418
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Systematic biopsy plays a vital role in diagnosing prostate cancer, but it can lead to misdiagnoses or undertreatment. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its guided targeting technology provide the possibility of improving the use of biopsies. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of MRI screening and MRI/ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided transperineal biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer. Methods: We performed a retrospective study on patients with suspected prostate cancer in the Kunshan Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University from January, 2017, to December, 2019. All of the patients underwent MRI examinations, followed by a systematic biopsy (either alone or in combination with MRI/US fusion-guided targeted biopsy, based on MRI-visible lesions). We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of MRI screening and compared biopsy methods by considering sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) values. Results: A total of 157 patients were enrolled, including 112 patients with MRI-visible lesions and 45 patients without MRI-visible lesions. The cancer detection rate (CDR) was higher in patients with MRI-visible lesions (P < 0.001); however, the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) indicators were similar (P > 0.05). The AUC of MRI was 0.63, which was superior to the AUC values of ultrasound (AUC = 0.55, P = 0.031) and digital rectal examination (AUC = 0.52, P = 0.041) for screening prostate cancer. Both overall CDR and clinically significant prostate cancer detection rates were improved if we combined systematic biopsy and MRI/US fusion-guided targeted biopsy procedures. Conclusion: Overall, prior MRI screening may serve as a classifier for avoiding the overuse of biopsies. A combination of systematic and MRI/US fusion-guided targeted biopsy procedures offers an optimal regimen for detecting prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The learning curve for robotic-assisted transperineal MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy
    Viktor Alargkof
    Christian Engesser
    Hanns Christian Breit
    David Jean Winkel
    Helge Seifert
    Pawel Trotsenko
    Christian Wetterauer
    Scientific Reports, 14
  • [2] The learning curve for robotic-assisted transperineal MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy
    Alargkof, Viktor
    Engesser, Christian
    Breit, Hanns Christian
    Winkel, David Jean
    Seifert, Helge
    Trotsenko, Pawel
    Wetterauer, Christian
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [3] Application of MRI/US fusion-guided transrectal prostate biopsy
    Wu, Jianhong
    Sun, Kening
    Chen, Zhihao
    He, Yijun
    Zhu, Zhenfang
    Xiao, Li
    Sheng, Lu
    MINERVA SURGERY, 2023, 78 (06): : 734 - 736
  • [4] Multiparametric MRI fusion-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Kesch, Claudia
    Schuetz, Viktoria
    Dieffenbacher, Svenja
    Bonekamp, David
    Hadaschik, Boris Alexander
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Radtke, Jan P.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2018, 28 (02) : 172 - 177
  • [5] Multiparametric MRI in Biopsy Guidance for Prostate Cancer: Fusion-Guided
    Rothwax, Jason T.
    George, Arvin K.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [6] Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches
    Tewes, Susanne
    Peters, Inga
    Tiemeyer, Ansgar
    Peperhove, Matti
    Hartung, Dagmar
    Pertschy, Stefanie
    Kuczyk, Markus A.
    Wacker, Frank
    Hueper, Katja
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 2017
  • [7] PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE LEARNING CURVE FOR TRANSPERINEAL MRI/TRUS FUSION-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Kaneko, Masatomo
    Ramacciotti, Lorenzo Storino
    Paralkar, Divyangi
    Jadvar, Donya S.
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    Desai, Mihir
    Aron, Monish
    Aron, Manju
    Hopstone, Michelle
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Abreu, Andre Luis
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E312 - E312
  • [8] Use of TDI during MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy for suspected prostate cancer
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Fischer, Thomas
    Stephan, Carsten
    Treskatsch, Selda
    Jacques Baur, Alexander Daniel
    Jung, Ernst-Michael
    Hamm, Bernd
    Lerchbaumer, Markus Herbert
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2021, 78 (03) : 259 - 269
  • [9] Transperineal MRI-US Fusion-Guided Target Biopsy of the Prostate after Abdominoperineal Resection: A Case Report
    De Vulder, Nando
    Geldof, Koen
    Baekelandt, Frederic
    Gieraerts, Katrien
    JOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 105 (01):
  • [10] LEARNING CURVE OF ROBOTIC-ASSISTED TRANSPERINEAL MRI/ULTRASOUND FUSION-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Anagnostou, Vitkor Alargkof
    Engesser, Christian
    Trotsenko, Pawel
    Breit, Hanns-Christian
    Winkel, David
    Seifert, Helge
    Wetterauer, Christian
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E932 - E932