A branch-and-cut approach for the least cost influence problem on social networks

被引:9
作者
Gunnec, Dilek [1 ]
Raghavan, S. [2 ]
Zhang, Rui [3 ]
机构
[1] Ozyegin Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Univ Maryland, Syst Res Inst, Robert H Smith Sch Business, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Leeds Sch Business, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
exact method; influence maximization; integer programming; strong formulation;
D O I
10.1002/net.21941
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper studies a problem in the online targeted marketing setting called the least cost influence problem (LCIP) that is known to be NP-hard. The goal is to find the minimum total amount of inducements (individuals to target and associated tailored incentives) required to influence a given population. We develop a branch-and-cut approach to solve this LCIP on arbitrary graphs. We build upon Gunnec et al.'s novel totally unimodular (TU) formulation for the LCIP on trees. The key observation in applying this TU formulation to arbitrary graphs is to enforce an exponential set of inequalities that ensure the influence propagation network is acyclic. We also design several enhancements to the branch-and-cut procedure that improve its performance. We provide a large set of computational experiments on real-world graphs with up to 155 000 nodes and 327 000 edges that demonstrates the efficacy of the branch-and-cut approach. This branch-and-cut approach finds solutions that are on average 1.87% away from optimality based on a test-bed of 160 real-world graph instances. We also develop a heuristic that prioritizes nodes that receive low influence from their peers. This heuristic works particularly well on arbitrary graphs, providing solutions that are on average 1.99% away from optimality. Finally, we observe that partial incentives can result in significant cost savings, over 55% on average, compared to the setting where partial incentives are not allowed.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 105
页数:22
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], WORKING PAPER
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, TECHNICAL REPORT
  • [3] [Anonymous], WORKING PAPER
  • [4] Bourne FrancisS., 1957, SOME APPL BEHAV RES, P207
  • [5] SOCIAL TIES AND WORD-OF-MOUTH REFERRAL BEHAVIOR
    BROWN, JJ
    REINGEN, PH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1987, 14 (03) : 350 - 362
  • [6] ON THE APPROXIMABILITY OF INFLUENCE IN SOCIAL NETWORKS
    Chen, Ning
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON DISCRETE MATHEMATICS, 2009, 23 (03) : 1400 - 1415
  • [7] Cordasco Gennaro, 2015, Structural Information and Communication Complexity. 22nd International Colloquium, SIROCCO 2015. Post-Proceedings: LNCS 9439, P119, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-25258-2_9
  • [8] How to Influence People with Partial Incentives
    Demaine, Erik D.
    Hajiaghayi, MohammadTaghi
    Mahini, Hamid
    Malec, David L.
    Raghavan, S.
    Sawant, Anshul
    Zadimoghadam, Morteza
    [J]. WWW'14: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE WEB, 2014, : 937 - 947
  • [9] Dinh ThangN., 2012, PROCEEDING 23 ACM C, P165
  • [10] Least cost influence propagation in (social) networks
    Fischetti, Matteo
    Kahr, Michael
    Leitner, Markus
    Monaci, Michele
    Ruthmair, Mario
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2018, 170 (01) : 293 - 325