Escitalopram and duloxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a pooled analysis of two trials

被引:19
作者
Lam, Raymond W. [1 ]
Andersen, Henning F. [2 ]
Wade, Alan G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychiat, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1, Canada
[2] H Lundbeck & Co AS, Dept Biostat, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] CPS Clin Res Ctr, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
clinical global impression; Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; number needed to treat; remission; severe depression; withdrawals;
D O I
10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282ffdedc
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Pooled analyses have shown that escitalopram has superior effectiveness versus all comparators, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine. Recent studies have compared escitalopram with duloxetine. Data from two randomized, double-blind studies that compared escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) and duloxetine (60 mg/day) were pooled and analysed for all patients and for the subsample of severely depressed patients [baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score >= 30]. Escitalopram (n=280) was superior to duloxetine (n = 284) with respect to mean change from baseline in MADRS score at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 with a mean treatment difference at week 8 of 2.6 points (P<0.01). Similar results were seen for severely depressed patients, with a mean treatment difference of 3.7 points (P<0.01). Response and remission rates at week 8 were significantly higher for patients treated with escitalopram [response 67.1% for escitalopram compared with 53.2% for duloxetine, P<0.001; remission (MADRS <= 12) 54.3% for escitalopram compared with 44.4% for duloxetine, P<0.05]. The numbers needed to treat based on response and remission rates, in favour of escitalopram, were 8 and 11, respectively, for all patients (6 and 7, respectively, for severely depressed patients). Significantly fewer (P<0.001) patients (all cause and owing to adverse events) withdrew from the escitalopram group. This pooled analysis shows that over an 8-week treatment period, escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) is superior in both effectiveness and tolerability compared with duloxetine (60 mg/day).
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 187
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World Health Surveys [J].
Moussavi, Saba ;
Chatterji, Somnath ;
Verdes, Emese ;
Tandon, Ajay ;
Patel, Vikram ;
Ustun, Bedirhan .
LANCET, 2007, 370 (9590) :851-858
[22]  
NEMEROFF CB, 2007, BIOL PSYCHIAT
[23]   Duloxetine versus escitalopram and placebo in the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder: onset of antidepressant action, a non-inferiority study [J].
Nierenberg, Andrew A. ;
Greist, John H. ;
Mallinckrodt, Craig H. ;
Prakash, Apurva ;
Sambunaris, Angelo ;
Tollefson, Gary D. ;
Wohlreich, Madelaine M. .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2007, 23 (02) :401-416
[24]  
Parikh SV, 2001, CAN J PSYCHIAT, V46, p13S
[25]  
Reesal RT, 2001, CAN J PSYCHIAT, V46, p21S
[26]   The pharmacology of citalopram enantiomers:: The antagonism by R-citalopram on the effect of S-citalopram [J].
Sanchez, Connie .
BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 99 (02) :91-95
[27]   Efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other antidepressants: a meta-analysis [J].
Smith, D ;
Dempster, C ;
Glanville, J ;
Freemantle, N ;
Anderson, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 180 :396-404
[28]   Remission rates during treatment with venlafaxine or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [J].
Thase, ME ;
Entsuah, AR ;
Rudolph, RL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 178 :234-241
[29]   Global burden of depressive disorders in the year 2000 [J].
Üstün, TB ;
Ayuso-Mateos, JL ;
Chatterji, S ;
Mathers, C ;
Murray, CJL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 184 :386-392
[30]   A comparative study of the efficacy of acute and continuation treatment with escitalopram versus duloxetine in patients with major depressive disorder [J].
Wade, A. ;
Gembert, K. ;
Florea, I. .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2007, 23 (07) :1605-1614