Escitalopram and duloxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a pooled analysis of two trials

被引:19
作者
Lam, Raymond W. [1 ]
Andersen, Henning F. [2 ]
Wade, Alan G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychiat, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1, Canada
[2] H Lundbeck & Co AS, Dept Biostat, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] CPS Clin Res Ctr, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
clinical global impression; Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; number needed to treat; remission; severe depression; withdrawals;
D O I
10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282ffdedc
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Pooled analyses have shown that escitalopram has superior effectiveness versus all comparators, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine. Recent studies have compared escitalopram with duloxetine. Data from two randomized, double-blind studies that compared escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) and duloxetine (60 mg/day) were pooled and analysed for all patients and for the subsample of severely depressed patients [baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score >= 30]. Escitalopram (n=280) was superior to duloxetine (n = 284) with respect to mean change from baseline in MADRS score at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 with a mean treatment difference at week 8 of 2.6 points (P<0.01). Similar results were seen for severely depressed patients, with a mean treatment difference of 3.7 points (P<0.01). Response and remission rates at week 8 were significantly higher for patients treated with escitalopram [response 67.1% for escitalopram compared with 53.2% for duloxetine, P<0.001; remission (MADRS <= 12) 54.3% for escitalopram compared with 44.4% for duloxetine, P<0.05]. The numbers needed to treat based on response and remission rates, in favour of escitalopram, were 8 and 11, respectively, for all patients (6 and 7, respectively, for severely depressed patients). Significantly fewer (P<0.001) patients (all cause and owing to adverse events) withdrew from the escitalopram group. This pooled analysis shows that over an 8-week treatment period, escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) is superior in both effectiveness and tolerability compared with duloxetine (60 mg/day).
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 187
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability [J].
Anderson, IM .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2000, 58 (01) :19-36
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Am J Psychiatry, V157, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, ICH HARM TRIP GUID G
[4]   A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, flexible-dose study to evaluate the tolerability, efficacy and effects of treatment discontinuation with escitalopram and paroxetine in patients with major depressive disorder [J].
Baldwin, DS ;
Cooper, JA ;
Huusom, AKT ;
Hindmarch, I .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 21 (03) :159-169
[5]  
Bauer Michael, 2002, World J Biol Psychiatry, V3, P69, DOI 10.3109/15622970209150605
[6]   Dose-response relationship of duloxetine in placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients with major depressive disorder [J].
Bech, Per ;
Kajdasz, Daniel K. ;
Porsdal, Vibeke .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 188 (03) :273-280
[7]   A comparative study of the efficacy of long-term treatment with escitalopram and paroxetine in severely depressed patients [J].
Boulenger, J. -P. ;
Huusom, A. K. T. ;
Florea, I. ;
Baekdal, T. ;
Sarchiapone, M. .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2006, 22 (07) :1331-1341
[8]   Duloxetine, 60 mg once daily, for major depressive disorder: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial [J].
Detke, MJ ;
Lu, YL ;
Goldstein, DJ ;
Hayes, JR ;
Demitrack, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 63 (04) :308-315
[9]  
*EL LILL CO, 2007, CYMB PACK INS
[10]  
GUY W, 1976, PUBLICATION ADM, V76, P217