Investigating the effects of illiquidity on credit risks via new liquidity augmented stochastic volatility jump diffusion model

被引:0
作者
Gaygisiz, Esma [1 ,2 ]
Karasan, Abdullah [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Hekimoglu, Alper [6 ]
机构
[1] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Econ, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Middle East Tech Univ, Inst Appl Math, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Magnimind Acad Sunnyvale, Sunnyvale, CA USA
[4] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Financial Math, Ankara, Turkey
[5] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Comp Sci & Elect Engn, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA
[6] European Investment Bank EIB, Model Validat Div, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
关键词
Liquidity; stochastic volatility; probability of default; credit spread; ASSET; OPTIONS;
D O I
10.1080/02331934.2021.2013842
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Liquidity is extremely important not only within the context of financial markets but also in every scale of economic transactions. In this study, within the realm of financial markets, we configure liquidity as an independent stochastic process moderating the fluidity of all transactions and hence dynamically changing asset values. This study's asset value process ignoring liquidity is modelled with a stochastic volatility jump-diffusion (SVJ) model and that model is augmented with the incorporation of a liquidity process. The new model is called liquidity augmented stochastic volatility jump-diffusion (LASVJ) model. The simulation results suggest that LASVJ model outperforms the models without liquidity. The application of LASVJ model on the estimation of probabilities of default and credit risk spreads, using actual financial data of the selected companies listed in Dow Jones 30, reveals that neglecting the liquidity dimension in asset valuation might lead to inefficient assessments of risks. The models without an illiquidity process underestimate the probabilities of default and credit spread risks in comparison to the liquidity augmented model, LASVJ model, and we believe this might have accounted for the ignored risks that caused the 2007-2008 financial crisis in a great degree.
引用
收藏
页码:2421 / 2449
页数:29
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Asset pricing with liquidity risk [J].
Acharya, VV ;
Pedersen, LH .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 77 (02) :375-410
[2]  
Aleksandrov N., 2010, LIQUIDITY MODELLING
[3]   ASSET PRICING AND THE BID ASK SPREAD [J].
AMIHUD, Y ;
MENDELSON, H .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1986, 17 (02) :223-249
[4]   Spanning and derivative-security valuation [J].
Bakshi, G ;
Madan, D .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 55 (02) :205-238
[5]  
Bates D., 2010, Bates, D. (2010). lme4: Mixed-effects modeling with R. Retrieved from INVALID_URI_IN_SOURCE
[6]   Jumps and stochastic volatility: Exchange rate processes implicit in deutsche mark options [J].
Bates, DS .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1996, 9 (01) :69-107
[7]  
Bedendo M., 2007, Journal of Financial Research, V30, P237
[8]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654
[9]   Market microstructure and asset pricing: On the compensation for illiquidity in stock returns [J].
Brennan, MJ ;
Subrahmanyam, A .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 41 (03) :441-464
[10]   Market Liquidity and Funding Liquidity [J].
Brunnermeier, Markus K. ;
Pedersen, Lasse Heje .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (06) :2201-2238