External validation of 4C ISARIC mortality score in critically ill COVID-19 patients from Saudi Arabia

被引:7
作者
Aletreby, Waked Tharwat [1 ]
Mumtaz, Shahzad Ahmad [1 ]
Shahzad, Saima Akhtar [1 ]
Ahmed, Intekhab [1 ]
Alodat, Mohammed Ali [1 ]
Gharba, Mohamed [2 ]
Farea, Zohdi Ahmed [1 ]
Mady, Ahmed Fouad [1 ,3 ]
Mahrnood, Waqas [1 ]
Mhawish, Huda [1 ]
Abdulmowla, Mad Munia [4 ]
Nasser, Rehab Mohammed [5 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Med City, Crit Care Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] Wollongong Hosp, Crit Care Dept, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Tanta Univ, Fac Med, Anesthesia Dept, Tanta, Egypt
[4] Alfaisal Univ, Coll Med, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] Prince Mohammed Bin Abdulaziz Hosp, Internal Med Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
来源
SAUDI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & MEDICAL SCIENCES | 2022年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
COVID-19; ISARIC; mortality; Saudi Arabia; survival; sensitivity and specificity;
D O I
10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_480_21
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: ISARIC mortality score is a risk stratification tool that helps predict the in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients. However, this tool was developed and validated in a British population, and thus, the external validation of this tool in local populations is important. Objectives: External validation of the ISARIC mortality score in COVID-19 patients from a large Saudi Arabian intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: This is a retrospective study that included all adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU of King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from March 2020 to June 2021. Patients who were pregnant or had pulmonary tuberculosis/human immunodeficiency virus were excluded along with patients with missing variables. Data were collected to calculate the ISARIC mortality score and then fitting receiver operator characteristic curve against patients' outcome. Results: A total of 1493 critically ill COVID-19 patients were included. The mortality was 38%, the area under the curve of the score was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-0.83, P < 0.001) and the cutoff value correctly classified 72.7% of the cohort. The cutoff value of >9 had sensitivity of 70.5% (95% CI: 66.6-74.3); specificity, 73.97% (95% CI: 71-76.8); positive predictive value, 62.4% (95% CI: 59.5-65.2) and negative predictive value, 80.2% (95% CI: 78.2-82.4). Conclusion: The ISARIC score was found to have excellent predictive ability for mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients in our Saudi Arabian cohort. A cutoff score of >9 was the optimal criterion.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Aletreby W. T., 2020, Saudi Crit. Care. J, V4, P79, DOI [DOI 10.4103/SCCJ.SCCJ_19_20, DOI 10.4103/SCCJ.SCCJ1920]
[2]   Clinical Characteristics and Predictors of 28-Day Mortality in 352 Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: A Retrospective Study [J].
Alharthy, Abdulrahman ;
Aletreby, Waleed ;
Faqihi, Fahad ;
Balhamar, Abdullah ;
Alaklobi, Feisal ;
Alanezi, Khaled ;
Jaganathan, Parameaswari ;
Tamim, Hani ;
Alqahtani, Saleh A. ;
Karakitsos, Dimitrios ;
Memish, Ziad A. .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 11 (01) :98-104
[3]  
Ali Rashid, 2021, J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, V33, P20
[4]   Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in COVID-19 Older Patients with Specifically Developed Scores [J].
Covino, Marcello ;
De Matteis, Giuseppe ;
Burzo, Maria Livia ;
Russo, Andrea ;
Forte, Evelina ;
Carnicelli, Annamaria ;
Piccioni, Andrea ;
Simeoni, Benedetta ;
Gasbarrini, Antonio ;
Franceschi, Francesco ;
Sandroni, Claudio .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2021, 69 (01) :37-43
[5]   Risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: development and validation of the 4C Mortality Score [J].
Knight, Stephen R. ;
Ho, Antonia ;
Pius, Riinu ;
Buchan, Iain ;
Carson, Gail ;
Drake, Thomas M. ;
Dunning, Jake ;
Fairfield, Cameron J. ;
Gamble, Carrol ;
Green, Christopher A. ;
Gupta, Rishi ;
Halpin, Sophie ;
Hardwick, Hayley E. ;
Holden, Karl A. ;
Horby, Peter W. ;
Jackson, Clare ;
Mclean, Kenneth A. ;
Merson, Laura ;
Nguyen-Van-Tam, Jonathan S. ;
Norman, Lisa ;
Noursadeghi, Mahdad ;
Olliaro, Piero L. ;
Pritchard, Mark G. ;
Russell, Clark D. ;
Shaw, Catherine A. ;
Sheikh, Aziz ;
Solomon, Tom ;
Sudlow, Cathie ;
Swann, Olivia, V ;
Turtle, Lance C. W. ;
Openshaw, Peter J. M. ;
Baillie, J. Kenneth ;
Semple, Malcolm G. ;
Docherty, Annemarie B. ;
Harrison, Ewen M. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 370
[6]  
Lee K, 2009, GLOB INST, P1
[7]   Tocilizumab in the treatment of rapidly evolving COVID-19 pneumonia and multifaceted critical illness: A retrospective case series [J].
Mady, Ahmed ;
Aletreby, Waleed ;
Abdulrahman, Basheer ;
Lhmdi, Mohammed ;
Noor, Alfateh M. ;
Alqahtani, Saleh A. ;
Soliman, Ibrahim ;
Alharthy, Abdulrahman ;
Karakitsos, Dimitrios ;
Memish, Ziad A. .
ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2020, 60 :417-424
[8]   Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Diagnostic Test Assessment [J].
Mandrekar, Jayawant N. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 5 (09) :1315-1316
[9]  
Ministry of Health, SAUD MOH PROT PAT SU
[10]  
Mittag N., 2013, Imputations: Benefits, risks and a method for missing data